From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PD2xa-0004Lm-3G for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:34:39 +0100 Received: from svr-orw-exc-08.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.97]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1PD1YZ-0003eR-Ca from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:04:43 -0700 Received: from na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com ([134.86.114.213]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-08.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:04:43 -0700 Received: from [172.30.80.166] ([172.30.80.166]) by na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:04:42 -0600 Message-ID: <4CCF2B68.2070201@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:04:40 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4CC00D57.4070601@xora.org.uk> <4CC0104B.4070108@xora.org.uk> In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Nov 2010 21:04:42.0951 (UTC) FILETIME=[67C56D70:01CB7A08] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.94.38.131 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Tom_Rini@mentor.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] turning conf/machine into a set of bblayers X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:34:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/10/21 Graeme Gregory : > >> Such a pity git doesnt have increasing rev numbers, a cool adition would >> be a flag in layer that showed the last rev of core it was tested with. >> >> Layer was tested with core 1 but core is now 999 would give an >> indication on drift between layers and core. >> >> Graeme > > Triggered by this (and apologies if I am drifting off-topic). > It would be nice if with amend.inc you could specify the PR of the > underlying recipe that this amend is for (and get a warning or error > if there is a mismatch) I know I'm late to the party but.. I don't think this is a big deal. Changes getting out of sync from foopkg 1.1 to foopkg 1.2? Yes. foopkg 1.1 PR="r1" to 1.1 PR="r10" ? Unlikely and something the human control side should be able to handle. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation