Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Preparing for release - Freeze on master
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:18:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE55FF6.5030900@balister.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290079874.3183.222.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com>

On 11/18/2010 03:31 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 21:31 +1030, Graham Gower wrote:
>> So, why not just branch it already and apply the same commit policy as
>> the existing stable branch.
>
> Essentially because nobody has yet volunteered to do the ongoing
> maintenance work that would be involved in having a long-lived stable
> branch.  And, if OE is going to have releases off master on a fairly
> frequent schedule (I think the proposal is four releases per year or
> thereabouts) then the requirement for such a branch is somewhat
> diminished.
>
> If you're interested in doing the work to maintain a new stable branch
> along the same lines as stable/2009, and you can commit the time that is
> required to make it work, then you are certainly very welcome to do so.
> You don't need any particular permission to do this: you can (subject to
> the Branching Policy) create a new branch at any time.

I'd like to emphasize this point, the tag is a sane place for people to 
start from. The OE project deliver meta-data for people to build 
products on. It is the responsibility of the people delivering 
images/packages to people to manage their own branches for maintenance.

We certainly encourage groups of people to collaborate with each other 
to maintain branches, but I don't see a one policy suits all branch.

One man's stable is anothers stagnant.

Philip



  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-18 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-16 18:20 Preparing for release - Freeze on master Khem Raj
2010-11-16 22:39 ` Paul Menzel
2010-11-16 22:46   ` Khem Raj
2010-11-16 22:52     ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-16 23:00       ` Khem Raj
2010-11-17  7:16         ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-17  9:12 ` Koen Kooi
2010-11-17  9:56   ` Graeme Gregory
2010-11-17 10:25     ` Koen Kooi
2010-11-17 19:26       ` Khem Raj
2010-11-18 10:08         ` Phil Blundell
2010-11-18 11:01           ` Graham Gower
2010-11-18 11:31             ` Phil Blundell
2010-11-18 17:18               ` Philip Balister [this message]
2010-11-18 11:09           ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-18 14:07             ` Chris Larson
2010-11-18 16:32           ` Khem Raj
2010-11-19 10:29           ` Koen Kooi
2010-11-17 19:20     ` Khem Raj
2010-11-17 19:15   ` Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CE55FF6.5030900@balister.org \
    --to=philip@balister.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox