From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 2.26.mail-out.ovh.net ([178.33.107.8] helo=26.mail-out.ovh.net) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp1Vi-0004nL-9h for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:42:50 +0100 Received: (qmail 2687 invoked by uid 503); 14 Feb 2011 15:42:44 -0000 Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail611.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 26.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Feb 2011 15:42:43 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Feb 2011 18:15:01 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Feb 2011 18:15:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4D595503.20409@eukrea.com> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:14:59 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4D59535A.1010602@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <4D59535A.1010602@mentor.com> X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 6126021394224229705 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N Subject: Re: testing-release-2011.1 failure: at91sam9263ek X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:42:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Tom, On 14/02/2011 17:07, Tom Rini wrote: > Here are the failures I see building for at91sam9263ek: > angstrom-2010.x (all images): http://pastebin.com/7g7wNWQj > > Perhaps this will be fixed when Ulf pushes updates for a newer version of > u-boot? The error itself is easily fixable but there may be run-time problems > still. > there is a patch in 2009.08 which fix this error, maybe it can apply to 2009.01 : recipes/u-boot/u-boot-2009.08/dont-inline-weak-symbols.patch Eric