From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp1oL-0002XB-IR for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:02:24 +0100 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Pp1n9-0005Mn-Kc from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:00:51 -0800 Received: from na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com ([134.86.114.213]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:00:51 -0800 Received: from [172.30.80.148] ([172.30.80.148]) by na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:00:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4D595FB7.7000802@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:00:39 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4D59535A.1010602@mentor.com> <4D595503.20409@eukrea.com> In-Reply-To: <4D595503.20409@eukrea.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2011 17:00:50.0610 (UTC) FILETIME=[BB972120:01CBCC68] Subject: Re: testing-release-2011.1 failure: at91sam9263ek X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:02:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 02/14/2011 09:14 AM, Eric Bénard wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 14/02/2011 17:07, Tom Rini wrote: >> Here are the failures I see building for at91sam9263ek: >> angstrom-2010.x (all images): http://pastebin.com/7g7wNWQj >> >> Perhaps this will be fixed when Ulf pushes updates for a newer version of >> u-boot? The error itself is easily fixable but there may be run-time >> problems >> still. >> > there is a patch in 2009.08 which fix this error, maybe it can apply to > 2009.01 : > recipes/u-boot/u-boot-2009.08/dont-inline-weak-symbols.patch I think that, plus one other (or, what I did for the mini2440 a few weeks back which had both patches I found for weak symbols combined) would make this build, but perhaps not run. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation