From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp2.nedap.com ([213.160.213.92] helo=smtp.nedap.com)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <jaap.dejong@nedap.com>) id 1QJkkK-0004lt-Vl
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Tue, 10 May 2011 13:04:57 +0200
Received: from nvs0066.nedap.local ([10.91.8.1]) by smtp.nedap.com with
	Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 10 May 2011 13:02:11 +0200
X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <0be8acd0000044bf@nedap.com>
Received: from [10.2.40.10] ([10.2.40.10]) by nedap.com ([10.91.8.1]) with
	ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.0) id 0be8acd0000044bf ;
	Tue, 10 May 2011 13:02:11 +0200
Message-ID: <4DC91B33.9080807@nedap.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:02:11 +0200
From: Jaap de Jong <jaap.dejong@nedap.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
References: <4DC8F3A2.2090005@nedap.com> <20110510100020.GA10493@mx.loc>
	<1305022004.8000.149.camel@phil-desktop>
In-Reply-To: <1305022004.8000.149.camel@phil-desktop>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2011 11:02:11.0919 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[B69035F0:01CC0F01]
Subject: Re: x86_64
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:04:57 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



On 05/10/2011 12:06 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:00 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:13:22AM +0200, Jaap de Jong wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> is there any support for 64 bit intel/amd machines?
>>> And if so, how to build for them?
>> Can we settle on a name please for i want to add a qemu machine for
>> testing x86_64?
>>
>> x8664
>> amd64
>> ...
>>
>> Opinions?
> "x86_64" seems to be what's currently used as the architecture name.  If
> you want a value for ${MACHINE} then I guess something like
> "x86_64-generic" would do.  I don't think there's any prohibition
> against underscores in machine names.
>
> p.

So I'm guessing it is not possible at this very moment?

Jaap.