From: Steffen Sledz <sledz@dresearch-fe.de>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppp: 2.4.5 seems to be ready for oe-dev too
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 08:10:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0D64DE.50804@dresearch-fe.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309454880.4401.32.camel@mattotaupa>
On 30.06.2011 19:28, Paul Menzel wrote:
> ppp_2.4.5: remove `DP = "-1"`
>
> is a more appropriate and precise commit summary in my opinion.
yepp
>> Oe-core is using 2.4.5 and it works OK there.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz <sledz@dresearch-fe.de>
>> ---
>> recipes/ppp/ppp_2.4.5.bb | 2 --
>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes/ppp/ppp_2.4.5.bb b/recipes/ppp/ppp_2.4.5.bb
>> index 2b6b6f7..86d5ae5 100644
>> --- a/recipes/ppp/ppp_2.4.5.bb
>> +++ b/recipes/ppp/ppp_2.4.5.bb
>> @@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ HOMEPAGE = "http://samba.org/ppp/"
>> DEPENDS = "libpcap"
>> LICENSE = "BSD GPLv2"
>> PR = "r1"
>> -# Not well tested
>> -DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
>>
>> PARALLEL_MAKE = ""
>
> I am getting the following warning when building the recipe with
> `minimal{,-uclibc}` which I do not get with PPP 2.4.3.
>
> NOTE: package ppp-2.4.5-r1: task do_qa_staging: Started
> WARNING: the following files were installed but not shipped in any package:
> WARNING: /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.5/pppol2tp.so
> WARNING: /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.5/openl2tp.so
>
> Could you fix this in a separate patch before committing this patch?
Can please someone of the oe-core guys check if the problem is fixed there? And cherry-pick the fix to oe-dev master in that case.
Thx,
Steffen
--
DResearch Fahrzeugelektronik GmbH
Otto-Schmirgal-Str. 3, 10319 Berlin, Germany
Tel: +49 30 515932-237 mailto:sledz@dresearch-fe.de
Fax: +49 30 515932-299
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Weber, Werner Mögle;
Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg; HRB 130120 B;
Ust.-IDNr. DE273952058
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-01 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-30 10:12 Any reasons not to use "newer" ppp? Steffen Sledz
2011-06-30 10:15 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-30 10:22 ` [PATCH] ppp: 2.4.5 seems to be ready for oe-dev too Steffen Sledz
2011-06-30 17:28 ` Paul Menzel
2011-07-01 6:10 ` Steffen Sledz [this message]
2011-07-04 8:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ppp-2.4.5: own package for PPPoL2TP plugin Steffen Sledz
2011-07-04 8:52 ` Paul Menzel
2011-07-04 10:58 ` Steffen Sledz
2011-07-04 8:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ppp-2.4.5: remove `DP = "-1"` Steffen Sledz
2011-07-04 8:54 ` Paul Menzel
2011-07-04 9:09 ` Steffen Sledz
2011-07-04 10:58 ` Steffen Sledz
2011-07-01 15:39 ` Any reasons not to use "newer" ppp? Steffen Sledz
2011-07-01 15:55 ` Koen Kooi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0D64DE.50804@dresearch-fe.de \
--to=sledz@dresearch-fe.de \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox