From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Performance measurement: Building openembedded-core with and without overclocking on C-i7 2600K
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:13:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9CA882.7080107@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E9C93AB.7090705@telia.com>
On 10/17/2011 1:44 PM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> If anyone is interested...
>
thanks for numbers. Is there statistics on 64bit host Vs. 32bit build
host available too ?
> Same machine in two different configurations.
>
> .........................................................#1...........................#2
>
> P8Z68V Pro
> Core-i7 2600K @ 3.4 GHz..................4.4 GHz
> 8 GB @ ...........................................1333
> MHz...............1640 MHz
> 1TB WD Black 7200 RPM
> Ubuntu 11-10
>
> Almost all source code already in source directory
>
> Building meta-toolchain is 13% faster with overclocking.
>
>
> #1
> build: meta-toolchain
> START 10:46:23 55:52
> FINISH 11:42:15
> build: core-image-minimal
> START 11:42:15 17:34
> FINISH 11:59:49
> build: core-image-sato
> START 13:40:47 01:19
> FINISH 13:42:06
> Build fails, since one package could not be downloaded.
> build: meta-toolchain-sdk
> START 13:42:06 00:38
> FINISH 13:42:44
> build: adt-installer
> START 13:42:44 00:03
> FINISH 13:42:51
> build: meta-ide-support
> START 13:42:51 01:13
> FINISH 13:44:04
>
>
>
> #2
> build: meta-toolchain
> START 20:18:51 49:19 (vs 55:52)
> FINISH 21:08:10
> build: core-image-minimal
> START 21:08:10 16:38 (vs 17:34)
> FINISH 21:24:48
> build: core-image-sato
> START 21:24:48 15:38 (vs 01:19 - I think I have a problem in the first
> build)
> FINISH 21:40:26
> build: meta-toolchain-sdk
> START 21:40:26 00:59 (vs 00:38)
> FINISH 21:41:25
> build: adt-installer
> START 21:41:25 00:03 (vs 00:03)
> FINISH 21:41:28
> build: meta-ide-support
> START 21:41:28 01:03 (vs 01:13)
> FINISH 21:42:31
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-17 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-17 20:44 Performance measurement: Building openembedded-core with and without overclocking on C-i7 2600K Ulf Samuelsson
2011-10-17 22:13 ` Khem Raj [this message]
2011-10-18 6:03 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-10-18 14:44 ` Khem Raj
2011-10-18 14:47 ` Phil Blundell
2011-10-18 22:34 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-10-23 17:50 ` Roman Khimov
2011-10-23 21:50 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-10-29 14:23 ` Raffaele Recalcati
2011-10-18 6:28 ` Anders Darander
2011-10-18 12:05 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-10-18 12:19 ` Anders Darander
2011-10-18 13:40 ` Ulf Samuelsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9CA882.7080107@gmail.com \
--to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox