From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Support for R/W git in bitbake
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:12:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8E776D.5020005@emagii.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7419249.iRUESFeaJl@helios>
On 2012-04-18 09:28, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 April 2012 03:34:27 Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> 1. If I am busy working on an application, then it simplifies the
>> development process.
>> I can modify the code in the tree and push.
>> This is mainly for kernel development.
>>
>> 2. If I work on a prerelease of some S/W drivers/Applications under NDA,
>> then I cannot make that code publicly available
>> but I still want to put that on my Internet accessible git server.
>> Typicailly this is before the release of a new chip and info about
>> the chip should not be
>> made public before the chip is released.
>>
>> 3. I want to be able to ship something similar to the Angstrom setup
>> scripts
>> to someone else, and have them build an image, but it should not
>> be available
>> to anyone not accepted (without public key at the git server).
>>
>> There are other uses for such a functionality, but those are my
>> immediate needs.
>>
>> As you see, this is mostly for development.
>> Once the code is released, then the recipe would be changed to the
>> normal git access.
>>
>> Didn't know anything about the externalsrc bbclass, but after checking,
>> I would say no.
>> It won't do the two things above. I do see the use of it though.
> externalsrc should handle everything except automatically fetching the source;
> for that you need to have your own local git clone (which of course can be
> r/w). I guess it depends on whether you expect to be sending such recipes to
> non-developers; for developers it ought not to be too much of a hassle to have
> their own local git clone.
>
> The only problem with having an r/w checkout you are doing development in
> under WORKDIR is that if you bitbake -c clean the recipe you will lose
> whatever you are working on - externalsrc avoids this.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
I am working with a company, which OEMs their solution to other companies.
They get tons of questions from those customers, and based on that
I would like to avoid anything which requires manual intervention
of the developer.
As for cleaning out changes, it might happen, but I am prepared to take
the risk.
Today I am initializing a git after the extract anyway.
I am sure I will use externalsrc for something.
--
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
ulf@emagii.com
+46 722 427437
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 22:35 RFC: Support for R/W git in bitbake Ulf Samuelsson
2012-04-17 23:07 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-04-18 1:34 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2012-04-18 6:24 ` Antonio Ospite
2012-04-19 7:25 ` Anders Darander
2012-04-18 7:28 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-04-18 8:12 ` Ulf Samuelsson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8E776D.5020005@emagii.com \
--to=ulf@emagii.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox