From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.213.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SLIKJ-00083R-Fo for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:12:59 +0200 Received: by yhjj56 with SMTP id j56so5455701yhj.6 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:03:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mjtpv5Cf5nojlsDPMqaUn+T3ski/9yVYaJtf3Cj9pXA=; b=S0Yx8vC9kO/5kDpjEJ8j+nJYbtsoZCWqH0wc4Aa/eHMicmljvfhj10D7TONBJKxqTD HFVWkXGgv5vc+iQNQ4v4/HSTHh0H9+UVJoqoaz7/98fyon+lSXg8pPYJmSDLQ3i7qG9F xUDy0Kl7zByxiKfqLSdlonrkgaADRg+h1Mub548SKHq7eRLWxnnfkDm/b2O3xrAILZMV ciqZ7PtmI6kQ0llgVeg4c2jmTCoVi5G5VdBJgzJB/4SN7D+EmS/0KGPUqIFQR5yb5or4 KLOlXOjGz9VlEZWetAJ1tsE42YQw0vFaltWiGG9AuNHXZjJ9agU2b3c3YLiP2RS5AGXI 9rig== Received: by 10.236.184.135 with SMTP id s7mr6292050yhm.29.1334945009112; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:03:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (dpc674485156.direcpc.com. [67.44.85.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u15sm4393965anb.9.2012.04.20.11.03.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F91A4E4.2090608@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:03:16 -0700 From: j User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120406 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4F88ACCE.1030202@gmail.com> <4F88ADA3.5030804@gmail.com> <4F8C9902.8020904@gmail.com> <4F8C9D26.9050500@mlbassoc.com> <4F8C9E68.9050106@gmail.com> <4F8CCAAA.6050406@gmail.com> <4F8D9245.3080908@mlbassoc.com> <4F8DBFF3.2060508@gmail.com> <4F8DC5B5.600@windriver.com> <4F8DC939.90208@gmail.com> <4F8DCFC4.9010508@gmail.com> <4F8DDDB7.5010605@gmail.com> <4F8E0CDF.6040401@gmail.com> <4F8E53DD.6060404@gmail.com> <4F8F8749.8000803@gmail.com> <4F90B056.5020209@gmail.com> <4F9144BE.1070508@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <4F9144BE.1070508@mlbassoc.com> Subject: Re: [oe-core] ld segfault cant figure it out X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:12:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/20/2012 04:13 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-04-19 18:39, j wrote: >> On 04/18/2012 11:24 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:32 PM, j wrote: >>>>> on ubuntu edit /etc/security/limits.conf on build host and then add >>>>> * soft core unlimited >>> >>> btw. reboot your machine after this change is made >>> >>>>> that should generate core files. After this search for core* files in >>>>> build tree >>>>> and see if there are any then debug them with gdb to diagnose it >>>>> further >>>>> >>>>> Now I am not sure if those segfaults directly relate to >>>>> malfunction of >>>>> image >>>>> if thats the case but its likely. You should also try to explore the >>>>> reasons why >>>>> the image fails to behave as expected. >>>> I will do as suggested as well as do a full image build again and >>>> see if I >>>> can find out all that is not working. Thank you for the extra >>>> debugging info >>>> and suggestions. Are there any keywords to search through all the >>>> files for >>>> including the normal log files, it may help me track down things even >>>> further. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openembedded-devel mailing list >>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> >> did the reboot went through the build but yet did not produce any >> core files. But I noticed ulimit was still 0 so changed it to >> unlimited now and building again, hopefully that >> will get some core dumps. Will post back once I have more info and >> will separate anything by which machine as even the 2nd borrowed >> machine segfaults in the same way. > > Is your borrowed machine also running ArchLinux? If so, have > you tried anything else - Ubuntu, Fedora, etc? As far as I can > tell, you're the only one suffering these problems and also you > seem to be the only one using ArchLinux. > > Note: I tried to duplicate your problems here, but I've never used > ArchLinux and it's so primitive and hard to use (compared to what > I use everyday) that I simply don't have the time to mess with it > any more. > Also though not mentioned in my last email Gary THANK YOU!! 3rd machine has started build now. I installed 11.04 i386. This has intel graphics, where as the other 2 had nvidia. But this will be another slow build.