From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-vx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SMnEZ-0002wk-2Y for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:25:15 +0200 Received: by vcbfl13 with SMTP id fl13so930058vcb.6 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:15:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p1C8t0Yq6jDtprgyLrZWXTsfF/jPPZn1lAsOCmuPMFk=; b=OJXPlozRhm49wtyFHHk2wJ8W5E2E63ae5/s8jwHNh8OyJJzkvd84LIt0qq0uVpsHKn Ja5ukP19Szc7Tbj8xHeGoVuHuCOywA1BPCMvh7Y3K/8zKFKn6JuN3zWDJy0St60EfMrR c6eUmcjGWsHnfcftBQbSN+BZnBwhes1d/WjQn58MqriyGSayAiLWlRvCDlyx+b5gbS9X +5caQPDTrcdwmX6K+wgRhTtDiTKrvrjpnxvfKM70Ucac/D0+cTnZs9+PDYAHnHtO4Xyc 5trO57xtxsZEtjlZuyYRB+N97KWfmRCiZgkl0kd15rOWswwbKGHo3DI5OedVbCj50GpI CoIA== Received: by 10.52.90.178 with SMTP id bx18mr13995905vdb.123.1335302139788; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (dpc674485156.direcpc.com. [67.44.85.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i4sm33445095vdk.8.2012.04.24.14.15.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F9717ED.9020503@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:15:25 -0700 From: j User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120406 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4F88ACCE.1030202@gmail.com> <4F8C9E68.9050106@gmail.com> <4F8CCAAA.6050406@gmail.com> <4F8D9245.3080908@mlbassoc.com> <4F8DBFF3.2060508@gmail.com> <4F8DC5B5.600@windriver.com> <4F8DC939.90208@gmail.com> <4F8DCFC4.9010508@gmail.com> <4F8DDDB7.5010605@gmail.com> <4F8E0CDF.6040401@gmail.com> <4F8E53DD.6060404@gmail.com> <4F8F8749.8000803@gmail.com> <4F90B056.5020209@gmail.com> <4F9144BE.1070508@mlbassoc.com> <4F91A4E4.2090608@gmail.com> <4F932ADB.7040003@gmail.com> <4F970F9C.7030508@gmail.com> <1335300289.3133.136.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> <4F9713C4.2020908@gmail.com> <1335301431.3133.144.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> In-Reply-To: <1335301431.3133.144.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> Subject: Re: [oe-core] 3 build machines all failing in the same manner - was:ld segfault cant figure it out X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:25:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/24/2012 02:03 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 13:57 -0700, j wrote: >> The build machines all give messages like this just vary on libc version >> listed >> >> [47152.769257] ld[22617]: segfault at 403 ip 00007f2149cfd435 sp >> 00007fffb83ccb50 error 4 in libc-2.15.so[7f2149cb6000+197000] >> 2012-04-18T14:50:08-07:00 localhost kernel: [47163.860996] ld[31096]: >> segfault at 403 ip 00007fc2da152435 sp 00007fffab491c30 error 4 in >> libc-2.15.so[7fc2da10b000+197000] > Does this correlate with an actual problem, or did you just see those > messages in the log and think that they were cause for concern? I was assuming since the machine segfaulted and I could not get working images they were related. > > If I had to guess I would say that this is probably some autoconf test > which is tickling a bug in ld. You could probably establish which > package is doing that by looking at the timestamps and correlating them > with the build logs. I will try this once the machines go through the process again. > >> qa.log has more than these messages but every machines logs are the same >> like this >> >> udev-182: udev: >> /home/gusterson/OpenEmbed/setup-scripts/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/udev-182-r0/packages-split/libgudev/lib/libgudev-1.0.so.0.1.1 >> links to something under exec_prefix > That doesn't appear to be related to the ld segfault > . >> each one of the machines from a fresh install have this problem. The >> resulting image boots but does not fully function. I have issues such as >> the native sdk does not install all the packages correctly. >> example would be install. >> normall you would find it >> /usr/bin/install >> I end up with >> /home/bill/OE/usr/bin/install > ... and nor really does this. This latter problem is almost certainly > just a bug in the SDK packaging and nothing at all to do with your build > host. > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel I will just focus on trying to match timestamps with the segfault and trying to sort out all the issues once I have a built image. I know I do not fully grasp everything here so thank you for your help and if I find anything relevant or can post further info on this I will share. Unless there are more suggestions. Thank you