From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ey0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPq24-0001w6-5m for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 09:00:56 +0200 Received: by eaae1 with SMTP id e1so338341eaa.6 for ; Wed, 02 May 2012 23:51:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=0jlQTKpPBTs3WdJJi1ss3hrIgUscUrIoa/hTGkObdlc=; b=wR1/13t33A38djgX+R/xyGk3miLW6szoDSNJiWn/0b9rmDcNCQ03mN58OqdOUbcO8K p46hx89HMgOBZezWsR1XU6WRGt13k+LvgAqvRBbhbSl19nXY0B6qpqEImbGe56DL2PeC cyAsqRW2JIY+h66bhrCsnjvbpCQ6JCfcECoOMG0dSSAXwOgd5Gm6+TkOTUE4VIZoNrno 9y2U29M1WijtNjoPNRsCx+6oO5clifPKvsEf3vnOQgb0pVu/TzyY2B7BzyxxeNsnogPo K6/2geiqC/CzaHvurWWBWznH/fpzAWdXxDqPFtYF4w7HAyfOMJWLVKpVlEDScS41FdD+ tqdQ== Received: by 10.213.123.1 with SMTP id n1mr167636ebr.130.1336027871226; Wed, 02 May 2012 23:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.54.74.16] (64-103-25-233.cisco.com. [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d18sm20557101eeb.7.2012.05.02.23.51.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 May 2012 23:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FA22A58.3040100@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 08:48:56 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFydGluIEVydHPDpXM=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120326 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4F9A932F.1020400@gmail.com> <4F9F8630.3070901@gmail.com> <4FA0FFD5.6080201@gmail.com> <4FA1A1C8.3030705@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FA1A1C8.3030705@gmail.com> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.11 Subject: Re: Openembedded and ld-linux-armhf.so.3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 07:00:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 05/02/12 23:06, Khem Raj wrote: > On 05/02/2012 02:35 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote: > > The patches posted seems to be working fine. I at least didn't have > > any problems with them. > > > thanks for trying them out. GCC patch is final but eglibc patch I > still got to improve that its not final version yet. No problem. Is there also plans for renaming the toolchains created to arm-none-linux-gnueabihf when using hardfloats? Tried doing that, but gcc failed first. Then, after patching up gcc like a madman as well as adding linux-gnueabihf to the package_qa_get_machine_dict dictionary in insane.bbclass, several other projects failed. Among them were openssl and shadow as far as I remember. Probably others as well, but that's where I gave up. Cool, so this will be put upstream with gcc 4.7 and eglibc 2.15? Btw, I was trying your patches with 4.6, not 4.7, as we have not attempted to migrate right now. Will do that soon though, but not right now. - Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel