From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPwbS-0004xJ-OD for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 16:01:54 +0200 Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so2150535pbb.6 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 06:52:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tj6f2ZrkwXr5xCDaKHQEEj5GBuE7JxiGw9xMbTYy//4=; b=ryctd4HvKbLb4NehjyZkyo4o3BkDeZ+0d4SRyuukOXU7X5FTSxkgm+TtX1wwzZGSvH KEVqlOEWNVG/KlmP7Pvy3Q84dUXOQH6/CMDtWhADFcMtI+GVkeF+ANUkmzE6LbZw+RI3 5wj6e1iaOIdlxbNprCVa3RgkUkxVGqxpS32tX1HDwT1e/ZKLlnNmePCKeQe/NJ84Mbgx PCvsLS5Ji8S3b07jyFQ6RKItRlu+s3n4kPHse4YJ+e+VoEV2AjofqN8uztxmp+MhDcLN 4WgAcqGRmznB0kjtdzCQyMbaNyvhx7G+7ybe6gYAcu/KvlilE/pFL/7y2TlouTjtu438 AIsg== Received: by 10.68.221.133 with SMTP id qe5mr8143164pbc.24.1336053128318; Thu, 03 May 2012 06:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.23.4.147] (natint3.juniper.net. [66.129.224.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nt8sm5382556pbb.12.2012.05.03.06.52.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 May 2012 06:52:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FA28D83.90604@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 06:52:03 -0700 From: Khem Raj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120411 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4F9A932F.1020400@gmail.com> <4F9F8630.3070901@gmail.com> <4FA0FFD5.6080201@gmail.com> <4FA1A1C8.3030705@gmail.com> <4FA22A58.3040100@gmail.com> <4FA23915.6040604@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FA23915.6040604@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Subject: Re: Openembedded and ld-linux-armhf.so.3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 14:01:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/03/2012 12:51 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote: > Fair point, I was just told that some packages might look at the > name of the toolchain, and perhaps not give the optimal path for > hard floats with the name of linux-gnueabi. Clearly some packages > do actually look at the name of the toolchain, but for most cases > at least, the only difference will be the hardfloat flag given to > the compiler. Also seen quite a few toolchains using hardfloats > which has the hf prefix, to show that this is actually a hardfloat > toolchain. some distros may rely on triplet and if it makes into gcc and gcc starts relying on it we will have to reconsider but at present I dont see a need to change triplet -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+ijYMACgkQuwUzVZGdMxQoGACfSjsIVwB+uPW/cDbtUbQR87oC r/gAniC35ygSHDUIe0O1urrsO/w+gcEl =ZLo8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----