From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ch1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.184] helo=ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TahSr-0006IS-NN for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 07:37:50 +0100 Received: from mail185-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.229) by CH1EHSOBE017.bigfish.com (10.43.70.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 05:53:28 +0000 Received: from mail185-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail185-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992BE240070; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 05:53:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: 1 X-BigFish: VS1(zz98dI9371Ic89bhc85dh1432I1447Izz1de0h1202h1d1ah1d2ah10d2mzz17326ah8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1155h) Received: from mail185-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail185-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1353390807235359_21592; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 05:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS035.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.247]) by mail185-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD41220220; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 05:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by CH1EHSMHS035.bigfish.com (10.43.70.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 05:53:26 +0000 Received: from tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (10.81.153.31) by 039-SN1MMR1-004.039d.mgd.msft.net (10.84.1.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 05:53:26 +0000 Received: from [10.192.208.249] (guo-desktop.ap.freescale.net [10.192.208.249]) by tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id qAK5rLIK022502; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:53:23 -0700 Message-ID: <50AB1AE1.80803@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:53:37 +0800 From: chunrongguo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <1353031219-16200-1-git-send-email-b40290@freescale.com> <20121119133040.GB5534@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20121119133040.GB5534@windriver.com> X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.11 Cc: B29882@freescale.com, B19537@freescale.com, Joe MacDonald Subject: Re: [meta-networking v5 ] inetutils : Update to 1.9.1 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 06:37:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, 1. the following patches were accepted by inetutils 1.9.1 upstream inetutils-1.8-0002-argp-fix-program_invocation_name-detection.patch inetutils-1.8-1001-ftp-rename-ruserpass-to-avoid-C-library-collision.patch inetutils-1.8-1002-rshd-detect-__rcmd_errstr-support-in-the-C-lib.patch inetutils-1.8-1003-use-daemon-from-the-C-library-when-possible.patch inetutils-1.8-1004-detect-fork-support.patch inetutils-1.8-1005-ftpd-add-daemon-D-nommu-support.patch 2. the following patches were pending inetutils-1.8-0001-printf-parse-pull-in-features.h-for-__GLIBC__.patch inetutils-1.8-0003-wchar.patch fix-disable-ipv6.patch I will submit new patch for inetutils 1.9.1 thank you chunrong On 2012?11?19? 21:30, Joe MacDonald wrote: > [Re: [oe] [meta-networking v5 ] inetutils : Update to 1.9.1] On 12.11.19 (Mon 08:34) Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Chunrong Guo wrote: >> >>> * There are difference spaces between inetutils-1.8/COPYING >>> and inetutils-1.9.1/COPYING,so md5sum is changed. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Chunrong Guo >>> >> I did not built or tested it but the commit log might be improved to >> express what happened to the patches you removed. I assume they were fixed >> upstream but it is not clear looking at the changes or commit log. >> >> Please make it explicit. > I agree. I only got do to a proper build test yesterday, and all seemed > well, but I'd like to see the log expanded a bit as well. > > Almost there! And thanks for the update to the new version, that's > something I'd been thinking I was going to need to get to soon, so it's > saving me some time. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel