From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpauth13.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.37]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeWkF-0005Tp-EU for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:59:34 +0100 Received: (qmail 23876 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2012 19:38:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.41.60.82) by smtpauth13.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.37) with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2012 19:38:33 -0000 Message-ID: <50B90B37.5080505@pabigot.com> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:38:31 -0600 From: "Peter A. Bigot" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBNw7xsbGVy?= References: In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] gphoto2: fix gettext build error X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 19:59:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 11/30/2012 12:38 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Peter Bigot wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Andreas Müller >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Andreas Müller >>> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Andreas Müller >>>> wrote: >>>>>> gettext 0.18.1 is installed both on the build machine, and as a native >>>>>> package used when building under bitbake. If it's at all relevant, I >>>>>> have >>>>>> LANG=en_US.UTF-8 in the environment in which bitbake is executed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you try a full reversion of 5febf70? Can you tell why, in your >>>>>> environment, autotools.bbclass replaces the Makefile.in.in for >>>>>> libgphoto2? >>>>>> It does not do this for me (otherwise I think Koen's patch that only >>>>>> reverts >>>>>> part of 5febf70 would not work). >>>>>> >>>>>> Peter >>>>>> >>>>> It should copy see autotools.bbclass line 195 >>>>> >>>>> Andreas >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> One stupid question: Are you working with oe-core master - because >>>> >>>> commit 841ea3c1c18e50e77fccbd5f44d6a79a50913b67 >>>> Author: Richard Purdie >>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 08:43:01 2012 +0000 >>>> >>>> which started my gphoto2 trouble is not found in danny >> >> Yes, seems to be a danny/master inconsistency, resulting from oe-core >> branching danny six weeks before meta-openembedded did, with my checkouts >> happening between the two points. >> >>> So from what I can see now is that meta-oe's >>> >>> commit 92e3f684d14fd287194e78bc5e65f80504758b7d >>> Author: Koen Kooi >>> Date: Wed Nov 21 14:42:02 2012 +0000 >>> >>> gphoto2: fix gettext build error >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi >>> >>> should be merged to danny and reverted (with PRbump) in master. >> >> I think 5febf70 should be reverted (with PR bump) in danny, which is where >> I'd started before I noticed 92e3f68 in patchwork. > agreed > >> In any case 92e3f68 should be discarded since it leaves the removal of AM_PO_SUBDIRS() from >> configure.ac in place with no motivation once the Makefile.in.in is no >> longer overwritten. > Isn't that exactly what the patch I sent does? Probably. Unfortunately I had put my subscription on hold six months ago and had problems re-enabling it last weekend so I missed seeing your patch; that's been fixed and my address updated. I also hadn't bothered to pull recently, so didn't see that Koen's change had been applied. And so I added to the confusion; sorry about that. > >> If that seems plausible I'll prepare a patch. > Appreciated - because if would do it would most likely cause further > confusion :) > Actually, it'd probably lessen it, since I'm just a bit player in this theatre. But I'll give it a go later this afternoon after I make progress on what I'm supposed to be working on.... Peter