From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from owm.eumx.net (eumx.net [91.82.101.43]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB7960F54 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52416B6B.5010805@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:37:31 +0100 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1380015325-28852-1-git-send-email-ml@communistcode.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 1/2] lm_sensors: add ALLOW_EMPTY to lmsensors and lmsensors-config X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:37:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 24/09/13 10:52, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 24 September 2013 10:35, Jack Mitchell wrote: >> When building with dev-pkgs enabled I was hitting an error lmsensors-dev >> not available. Adding ALLOW_EMPTY allowed the empty package to be created >> and therefore satisfy the dependancy. > > Your ALLOW_EMPTY statements only apply to lmsensors and > lmsensors-config, not lmsensors-dev (as you're using just ${PN}), and > surely you don't need it on the lmsensors-config recipe at all. > > Ross > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > v2 on it's way with the RDEPENDS mechanism used as discussed on IRC and a better commit message.