From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB80871AC5 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2016 10:41:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,574,1473145200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="11739777" Received: from jalamego-mobl2.zpn.intel.com (HELO [10.219.5.146]) ([10.219.5.146]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2016 10:41:20 -0800 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4717571.f7GXZOAcRz@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20161129204327.GG2546@bill-the-cat> <19E9BF3F-664F-42A4-A170-5B7BB473ED80@gmail.com> From: Jose Lamego Message-ID: <53ca2ead-1b75-ff6d-30c1-abb16330bad3@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:41:20 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19E9BF3F-664F-42A4-A170-5B7BB473ED80@gmail.com> Cc: Tom Rini , Patrick Ohly , Michael Halstead Subject: Re: meta-openembedded patchwork git hook X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:41:28 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 64166 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uGS8ONqEX059lKlpuC0GNatUU4SUlinI3" --uGS8ONqEX059lKlpuC0GNatUU4SUlinI3 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ue67CtfILgbxD0k9GDIM3oLWV0orNFc1F"; protected-headers="v1" From: Jose Lamego To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Cc: Tom Rini , Patrick Ohly , Michael Halstead Message-ID: <53ca2ead-1b75-ff6d-30c1-abb16330bad3@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [oe] meta-openembedded patchwork git hook References: <4717571.f7GXZOAcRz@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20161129204327.GG2546@bill-the-cat> <19E9BF3F-664F-42A4-A170-5B7BB473ED80@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <19E9BF3F-664F-42A4-A170-5B7BB473ED80@gmail.com> --ue67CtfILgbxD0k9GDIM3oLWV0orNFc1F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/29/2016 07:50 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >=20 >> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:34 PM, Jose Lamego wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11/29/2016 02:43 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 06:52:46AM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> Martin just brought to my attention that the git hook for the=20 >>>> meta-openembedded repository that's supposed to update patchwork sti= ll isn't=20 >>>> working and hasn't done so for a very long time. I thought we'd fixe= d this so=20 >>>> that merged patches get marked as "Accepted", but at least for meta-= >>>> openembedded it seems like that's not the case. >>>> >>>> Jose / Michael - can you look into this if you haven't already? Plea= se let me=20 >>>> know if you need any help. >> >> The git hook was configured to update OE-core only, Michael will help = us >> to include meta-openembedded. >> >=20 > There are more repos using patchwork beyond OE-core and meta-opemebedde= d > please enable it for all of them as well. >=20 Now all of the projects are enabled to receive automatic updates from the git-hook (Thanks Michael). Please let me know if any undesired behavior is detected. >>> >>> Since I brought this up on IRC, I wanted to chime in here. First, if= >>> you want to use top-of-tree patchwork you'll also want to grab >>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/stephenfin/post-receive%20fixes/ >> >> >> Hi Tom, nice meeting you. OE-Patchwork is using a fork in [1] from >> freedesktop.org's patchwork at [2]. I will look at the hook fixes you >> mentioned at the first chance, thanks for the tip. >> >>> (and fwiw, I also have been setting the DJANGO part to 'dev' rather t= han >>> production for my use-case). Second, I think part of the problem is >>> that there are just some cases where the hashing fails, which for me = is >>> around 10% of the time. Depending on how much one uses bundles and >>> tracks what ends up being committed this may or may not be a problem.= >>> And I'm sure upstream patchwork would appreciate any changes to impro= ve >>> hashing success :) >>> >> >> Regards >> Jose >> >> --=20 >> Jose Lamego | OTC Embedded Platforms & Tools | GDC >> >> --=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >=20 --=20 Jose Lamego | OTC Embedded Platforms & Tools | GDC --ue67CtfILgbxD0k9GDIM3oLWV0orNFc1F-- --uGS8ONqEX059lKlpuC0GNatUU4SUlinI3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYPx1UAAoJEFJAtowlSEbnc6IIAIjc6AIF+EMiokE2B2dwMEO7 wYBLhPw05lB5FdqQkZRZaZDpHKqfuFluXuUJ3wZJYYyf3rXIlyCcCU6SRXZrA7kn i2xOFVIbEM0NVXhSo0nu+QBVE3jhy9thIGOx9jl+pbPDdNrVTRc2BkEy4O6mCrj3 1IAYdYs94BoX4w2DjtHmF6HkxlNyhCWEh1kYC8hjksR12wCcOUTx/HCmEhS3wTxe Jo+YBBIZwwvMgmILVo0eTU0BYq4K87jvRWkdzEissSXX6cWA/rtVxCaJEkg9mj+t FeJ0SthmFags0jmhxA5aSaKLUgsm2mBJQxQmZNzIWhd3r9bS1wzTbgYXifiKiyk= =YWzE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uGS8ONqEX059lKlpuC0GNatUU4SUlinI3--