Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 01/20] smstools: fix PN -> BPN for multilib

[Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>]

On 05/12/15 10:45, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:43:19PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> On Monday 11 May 2015 11:27:04 Martin Jansa wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:42:16PM +0800, Yi Zhao wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao <yi.zhao@windriver.com>
>>> Changes 03, 18, 20 didn't make it to patchwork, because they were marked
>>> as Spam by gmail
>> Hang on, I'm confused. Why should the patches being marked as spam in gmail 
>> have any bearing on whether they should show up in patchwork? Surely gmail 
>> shouldn't be involved in the sending part, only subsequently when the mail is 
>> sent from the mailing list to you (since you use gmail)?
> Isn't patchwork reading some gmail account over imap?
>
> The list of patches not appearing in patchwork is exactly matching with
> patches marked as spam in my inbox, so I believe that the same is
> happening in patchwork's gmail account.

Does anyone know if it helps when I notice them in "Spam" and mark them
as "Not Spam"?