From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
To: <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [meta-java][PATCH 4/4] openjdk-8: add recipes for openjdk-8 and openjre-8
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:41:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5631CDAD.7030703@skidata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D1946B41-2BFF-49FA-A4C7-19A2A1D6C731@gmail.com>
On 10/28/2015 07:01 PM, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> This adds openjdk-8 for native and target builds and allows a stripped
> openjre-8 being built as well instead of trying to cherry-pick jre
> components from jdk-image.
>
> The recipes allow building openjdk-8 with or without:
> * x11
> * cups
> * alsa/pulseaudio
> and let packager enable unlimited-crypto, if desired.
>
> Since there can be only one PROVIDES for virtual/java-native and virtual/javac-native,
> move the provides to openjdk-8-native (I think everyone agrees it's a better
> choice than ecj-bootstrap-native).
>
> Plus: Applying a fix from openjdk-9 repository which fixes build issues using gcc5
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Rehsack <sno@netbsd.org>
> ---
> README | 13 +-
> recipes-core/cacao/cacao_1.6.1.bb | 2 +-
> recipes-core/ecj/ecj-bootstrap-native.bb | 2 -
> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/LICENSE | 347 +++
> .../dont-expect-fqpn-for-make.patch | 18 +
> .../openjdk-8-72b00/filter-aclocal-copy-too.patch | 11 +
> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/jvm.cfg | 41 +
> .../openjdk8-find-compiler-fix-env-respect.patch | 140 +
> .../openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-fix-shark-build.patch | 453 ++++
> .../openjdk8-fix-shark-stdc++11.patch | 2730 ++++++++++++++++++++
> .../openjdk8-no-genx11-in-headless.patch | 17 +
> .../openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-no-unused-deps.patch | 94 +
> ...o-in-favour-of-openembedded-package-split.patch | 120 +
> .../openjdk8-restrict-to-staging-dir.patch | 11 +
> ..._than_returning_address_of_local_variable.patch | 23 +
> .../remove-shell-variables-from-autoheader.patch | 31 +
> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-common.inc | 229 ++
> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-cross.inc | 202 ++
> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-native.inc | 63 +
> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-native_72b00.bb | 16 +
> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-release-72b00.inc | 89 +
> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_72b00.bb | 36 +
> recipes-core/openjdk/openjre-8_72b00.bb | 30 +
> 23 files changed, 4706 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/LICENSE
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/dont-expect-fqpn-for-make.patch
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/filter-aclocal-copy-too.patch
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/jvm.cfg
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-find-compiler-fix-env-respect.patch
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-fix-shark-build.patch
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-fix-shark-stdc++11.patch
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-no-genx11-in-headless.patch
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-no-unused-deps.patch
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-prevent-debuginfo-in-favour-of-openembedded-package-split.patch
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-restrict-to-staging-dir.patch
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-use_builtin_frame_address_0_rather_than_returning_address_of_local_variable.patch
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/remove-shell-variables-from-autoheader.patch
IMHO a version independent patches directory like for openjdk-7 would
also be good here.
To cite Otavio:
We could rename the patches directory for openjdk-7 and avoid the
version number on it. This would make easier for upgrades and to see
the diff between the patches.
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-common.inc
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-cross.inc
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-native.inc
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-native_72b00.bb
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-release-72b00.inc
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_72b00.bb
> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjre-8_72b00.bb
Furthermore I had problems building OpenJDK-7 with this patch applied.
But I will verify that again and come back to you!
best regards,
Richard L
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-29 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-28 18:01 [meta-java][PATCH 4/4] openjdk-8: add recipes for openjdk-8 and openjre-8 Jens Rehsack
2015-10-28 19:34 ` Dan McGregor
2015-10-28 19:59 ` Jens Rehsack
2015-10-29 7:41 ` Richard Leitner [this message]
2015-10-29 9:22 ` Jens Rehsack
2015-10-29 10:46 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-10-29 11:24 ` Jens Rehsack
2015-10-29 11:54 ` Richard Leitner
2015-10-29 12:08 ` Jens Rehsack
2015-10-29 15:51 ` Richard Leitner
2015-10-29 12:24 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-10-29 15:49 ` Richard Leitner
2015-10-29 16:03 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-10-29 18:51 ` Richard Leitner
2015-10-29 18:59 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-11-03 10:25 ` Jens Rehsack
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-27 20:31 Jens Rehsack
2015-10-30 9:09 ` Kaaria, Erkka
2015-10-30 11:46 ` Jens Rehsack
2015-10-30 12:41 ` Kaaria, Erkka
2015-10-30 12:59 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-10-30 13:26 ` Jens Rehsack
2015-10-30 13:23 ` Jens Rehsack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5631CDAD.7030703@skidata.com \
--to=richard.leitner@skidata.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox