Re: RFC after the fact - bug 1987

[Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@gmail.com>]

Hello Rolf,

Friday, March 16, 2007, 6:16:34 PM, you wrote:

> Hi,

> it seems I have still a few things to learn as far as updating OE 
> metadata goes.  Furthermore it seems I might have created the first 
> major fuck-up.  I apologize for the inconvenience this has caused to the
> OE community.

> Now, to sort things out; I committed 
> a96c9acac99b5599d2b0fb0a518603646414d166 yesterday to fix bug 1987. It
> seemed like an obvious case (move debug files into -dbg package) which
> is why I dared to commit.  psokolovsky made me aware that an RFC had 
> been necessary to make this commit to a core part of OE and that it 
> might have broken compilation for some OE users.

> Now here I am trying to do The Right Thing[TM].  I want to discuss "mtn
> diff -r e9d53f524190d295cb769c7594711fd76eb197b7 -r 
> a96c9acac99b5599d2b0fb0a518603646414d166".  Please let me know if there
> is anything wrong with this change.  If it should be reverted, feel free
> to do so or let me know via mail or IRC and I will fix it pronto.

  I doubt that it's due to that easy change. I suspect your earlier
commits, 2c516898480b1bc053c9cbf6da853a016059c4c6 &
286930242424d10b2503eb290dbc31c7975bab74 are to blame.

  Either way, I get here:

$bitbake angstrom-x11-image
OE Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION     = "1.6.7"
OE_REVISION    = "25edfc91e04a9233cb67583981d1d8aa3e82f0c0"
TARGET_ARCH    = "arm"
TARGET_OS      = "linux-gnueabi"
MACHINE        = "h4000"
DISTRO         = "angstrom"
DISTRO_VERSION = "test-20070316"
TARGET_FPU     = "soft"

NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc not available
NOTE: preferred version 2.6.19-hh8 of linux-handhelds-2.6 not available
NOTE: preferred version 2.6.19-hh8 of linux-handhelds-2.6 not available
NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc-initial not available
NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc not available
NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc-intermediate not available
NOTE: multiple preferred providers are available (glibc, glibc, glibc);
NOTE: consider defining only one PREFERRED_PROVIDER to match runtime glibc-gconv-iso8859-1
NOTE: package glibc-2.3.5+cvs20050627: started


      Whereas:

bitbake glibc -v

NOTE: Selecting already-staged glibc (2.5-r5) to satisfy glibc

(-c rebuild rebuilds 2.5)


    The same was report by at least 3 other people, including using
other distro than Angstrom.

> Regards

> Rolf



-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                            mailto:pmiscml@gmail.com