From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [200.17.161.174] (helo=listas.ossystems.com.br) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LXbSC-0006z9-DG for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:18:08 +0100 Received: from internet.ossystems.com.br (201-40-162-47.cable.viacabocom.com.br [201.40.162.47]) by listas.ossystems.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F834025B for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:17:04 -0200 (BRST) Received: from ossystems.com.br (unknown [10.1.0.243]) by internet.ossystems.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB8C740D9 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:16:58 -0200 (BRST) Received: by ossystems.com.br (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AB88061006F; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:16:45 -0200 (BRST) From: Otavio Salvador To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Organization: O.S. Systems Ltda. References: <200902121426.26727.roman@khimov.ru> <4994132E.2040603@balister.org> <4994168C.6010603@balister.org> X-URL: http://www.debian.org/~otavio/ X-Attribution: O.S. Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:16:45 -0200 In-Reply-To: <4994168C.6010603@balister.org> (Philip Balister's message of "Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:31:08 -0500") Message-ID: <87iqnfvlqa.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:18:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Philip Balister writes: > Philip Balister wrote: >> Koen Kooi wrote: >>> On 12-02-09 12:26, Roman I Khimov wrote: >>>> Hello all. >>>> >>>> Don't know why, but rpm2cpio tarball checksums are wrong, so here >>>> is the fix: >>> >>> If they are wrong we want to see the diff between the old and new >>> tarballs, replacing checksums as soon as upstream changes defeats >>> the purpose of us adding them. >> >> How can we find a copy of the tarball with the original checksum? I >> do not have it in my local source cache. The file date on the ftp >> server is March 1 2008. I'm surprised the FreeBSD crowd would change >> a tarball, without changing the version. > > I checked a couple of the files from this list: > > http://dir.filewatcher.com/d/FreeBSD/5.4-release/alpha/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz.3919.html > > and the md5sum is 6759b9c029d0c20c657b88d60bc2e277 > > And yes, I am sort of testing patchwork :) [1] > > Philip > > [1] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/6/ I'm also using this rpm2cpio since previous one couldn't be located by me and this works quite fine. I personally support this patch. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house."