From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com (mail-wm0-f66.google.com [74.125.82.66]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBB660589 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id o80so120645wme.0 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:32:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:subject:to:reply-to:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ktjB80mIFcQ/OhcfyU0c6rGIMNfvkzf5i7BrGI+iWUA=; b=mNXG1LYjrBHdtqx6ppEjIU0SWytWAkTQks/mKtVq5goAMo4v8KxJ5e3aVWG+HHp3Ii /mmitXuuHNWHaqHJ9QXXdd7TWgqT6P0sjIuza+8jJMA72q9xElyhTGwN7BGl+fNhRcXC yyW0RSRqpap7Z5RqVtXJDeTjg0SnQi4+6tlmHCfb91DmdEusraYnZZ72WJiCliwWNFsU H9vJlfN3LsezM1ieiW9M3XDvOPLhDEAgtSCD3a9mVXrkNWqpXLgYpVRJ6psl2KTMoVq1 G5lFbMcIbO0pehzhynInhnLA8QwdxdLEoKWwnopQ1ES9DOdEb+NWcnyZe/My5J+F9AXy J7Iw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:subject:to:reply-to:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ktjB80mIFcQ/OhcfyU0c6rGIMNfvkzf5i7BrGI+iWUA=; b=lQy//CNIIZyVHKhE1aUgk/GT5allS6Sy5XuioaHLFxGk5F9QBka1IaREt7z4jbNhG6 w4WJjekH6DJTYnRxKMSykkmUx4Knb02BENSf92Kz5h1eNGVr6e3shunPgM5thJ4pTFLF XAjOBlqh3klnXfvqzypq5TN0gwKxKneEeJa/we550v77aooCzaro9/X2BlJCJDxOaKt9 snsTevqNOFq8jAVGb/uSkG0EX3sGqhRkaA3sW0Yf4RVV8DcujKZZuJmUUDlQZpCu6ygB 4q61OveL0ahurIot2WjT8C+C47f9Jh6eD8Xc6wc5luZCG/Few4JBdvSScTdlyrtdpmvN 7uSw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKl7vXrFlQkeP6+PCN09QKGL+IfcQt7Iil4/MVep1PbrLBhTOiulIFwnZ6/nJeWLg== X-Received: by 10.28.203.2 with SMTP id b2mr11392044wmg.78.1468276378221; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:32:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.81.105] (2-234-21-239.ip220.fastwebnet.it. [2.234.21.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kg2sm1899510wjb.10.2016.07.11.15.32.57 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:32:57 -0700 (PDT) References: <14c344e66a5112f492cc21c9a7d0f217@xmsnet.nl> To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Reply-To: jacopo.malvestio@gmail.com From: Jacopo Malvestio Message-ID: <9b1d361b-b845-700f-d780-bbccc958a1c2@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:32:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <14c344e66a5112f492cc21c9a7d0f217@xmsnet.nl> Subject: [meta-java] gcc 4.8 and openjdk-8 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:32:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello All, I've created a .bbappend file with: CFLAGS_remove = "-fno-lifetime-dse" CXXFLAGS_remove = "-fno-lifetime-dse" but the do_configure step fail, bitbake -v openjdk-8 log: | configure: Current directory is /home/jacopo/yjp/poky/build/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/openjdk-8-native/72b05-r0/build. | configure: Since this is not the source root, configure will output the configuration here | configure: (as opposed to creating a configuration in /build/). | configure: However, this directory is not empty. This is not allowed, since it could | configure: seriously mess up just about everything. | configure: Try 'cd /home/jacopo/yjp/poky/build/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/openjdk-8-native/72b05-r0/jdk8u-e8bed1496ff2' and restart configure | configure: (or create a new empty directory and cd to it). | configure: error: Will not continue creating configuration in /home/jacopo/yjp/poky/build/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/openjdk-8-native/72b05-r0/build | NOTE: The following config.log files may provide further information. | NOTE: /home/jacopo/yjp/poky/build/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/openjdk-8-native/72b05-r0/build/config.log | ERROR: configure failed | ERROR: Function failed: do_configure (log file is located at /home/jacopo/yjp/poky/build/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/openjdk-8-native/72b05-r0/temp/log.do_configure.2980 I'm running on ubuntu 14.04 with gcc4.8 and openjdk 1.8, i don't think it's a side effect of the gcc6 patch, but in your opinion, i forgot something? thank you -- Jacopo