From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAADA600EB for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2017 11:22:27 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,346,1477983600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="1104312466" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.219.128.137]) ([10.219.128.137]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2017 11:22:26 -0800 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1486399174-28949-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> <1486453274.14889.135.camel@intel.com> <20170207102518.GA3276@jama> <1486465148.14889.140.camel@intel.com> <17a923eb-ec4b-1401-8277-cba1ddd1aae0@linux.intel.com> <1486494646.14889.144.camel@intel.com> From: Jose Lamego Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:22:18 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1486494646.14889.144.camel@intel.com> Subject: Re: Patchwork-Status via email X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 19:22:28 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 65026 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="llkgT9OTdEw9esf2OCooq3xv8PIjbjBBv" --llkgT9OTdEw9esf2OCooq3xv8PIjbjBBv Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="JjMpP6TrdCw7lKfbaTi2jWnSCIUn8aEt8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Jose Lamego To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [oe] Patchwork-Status via email References: <1486399174-28949-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> <1486453274.14889.135.camel@intel.com> <20170207102518.GA3276@jama> <1486465148.14889.140.camel@intel.com> <17a923eb-ec4b-1401-8277-cba1ddd1aae0@linux.intel.com> <1486494646.14889.144.camel@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1486494646.14889.144.camel@intel.com> --JjMpP6TrdCw7lKfbaTi2jWnSCIUn8aEt8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/07/2017 01:10 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 12:32 -0600, Jose Lamego wrote: >> >> On 02/07/2017 04:59 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: >>> What about this use case here: the original author wants to retract a= >>> patch. Can he do that via email and/or the web interface? >>> >> Patch submitter (and project maintainers) can update status manually >> through the web interface. >=20 > I suspect that this makes the email interface less useful that it could= > be. May I suggest that we relax the permission check so that also patch= > authors can change the status of a patch? >=20 Agree. I will handle this under the mentioned bugzilla. --=20 Jose Lamego | OTC Embedded Platforms & Tools | GDC --JjMpP6TrdCw7lKfbaTi2jWnSCIUn8aEt8-- --llkgT9OTdEw9esf2OCooq3xv8PIjbjBBv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYmh5yAAoJEFJAtowlSEbnzKYIAIZdDcaUeLqC2Z4EASrvj4fp Zl4Q9qCEiPQq3Ch1m/yLUF/yHVxdgAgDfFyNb3iDd8TjwVfqwbsF5XF+IoXUoLH1 vyx3ObK4/Z+vUfm6SUvBzuL+umoWX/GWzUt+4LfMztrGkEzXg9o1Yec+T5GUjQ6f 2vx2x4zF+QqvMoLhW0zSzB+u0Gbk/5IF0IWxYAyG6r///cqtPVfa1GI0EvGPTzSd ab9MDOgKgU61eE5ER3zUxNW6x3FAADTuIFxaYoKKyz8j9T1H+IzOrhrjrwQ857Ds NXkaxKJLceOZI7SOjnLamiF7/9Z7Qacr9cD++sALhAMX2IHbKF9r2dwiCLNo17c= =QDA3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --llkgT9OTdEw9esf2OCooq3xv8PIjbjBBv--