From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [64.235.106.9] (helo=astoria.ccjclearline.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N5ayA-0004vT-HS for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:11:57 +0100 Received: from cpe002129687b04-cm001225dbafb6.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([99.235.241.187] helo=crashcourse.ca) by astoria.ccjclearline.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N5awc-0007Eu-VV for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:10:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 03:09:17 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost To: OpenEmbedded Development mailing list Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - astoria.ccjclearline.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.openembedded.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crashcourse.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.235.106.9 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rpjday@crashcourse.ca X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: [PATCH] Aesthetic fix in chapter 1. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:11:57 -0000 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII A simple tidy of a comma-separated list in Chapter 1. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day --- first in a list of patches to fix aesthetic stuff in user manual -- this patch is as trivial as it gets, but i would prefer to do this a chapter at a time, if i might. i promise that future patches will be more substantive, but still be logically self-contained. is this the right format for submitting patches? i'm just stealing from the format for kernel patches. diff --git a/docs/usermanual/chapters/introduction.xml b/docs/usermanual/chapters/introduction.xml index 31f1f1f..28e7725 100644 --- a/docs/usermanual/chapters/introduction.xml +++ b/docs/usermanual/chapters/introduction.xml @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ - Must be able to emit packages (tar, rpm, deb,ipk) + Must be able to emit packages (tar, rpm, deb, ipk) ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ========================================================================