From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HQ3EO-0001GO-Gs for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:11:36 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HQ3ED-0003U2-6Q for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:11:25 +0100 Received: from f73a6.f.ppp-pool.de ([195.4.115.166]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:11:25 +0100 Received: from no2spam by f73a6.f.ppp-pool.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:11:25 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:11:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <45E6903F.6040708@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: f73a6.f.ppp-pool.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: [oe-commits] org.oe.dev rootfs_ipk.bbclass: Implements a sensational new feature called 'oe-feed' which, for the first time ever, actually lets you use your ipk deploy dir as a feed in ipkg.conf./mtcommit ../classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass Oh wait......we already could do that in the past, now couldn't we?? Set DEPLOY_ENABLE_OEFEED=1 in your shell env or local.conf to activate fast oe-feed/Packages creation, set DEPLOY_ENABLE_OEFEED=2 to enable traditional (and slooooow) oe-feed/Packages creation. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:11:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rolf Leggewie wrote: >> OEs feed management tools were removed a few years ago since it was decided that feed >> management was out of scope. That still holds. > > Where is a good place this useful software should be shared instead? Please disregard. I am catching up with the discussions I missed over the last few days.