Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: invalidating udev cache, how?
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:35:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <gh94cf$p59$2@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081204161543.GT16628@smtp.west.cox.net>

On 04-12-08 17:15, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 05:05:58PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The udev 124 has cache (/etc/dev.tar) to avoid doing the coldplug udev
>> dance that can take a few seconds to a minute depending on machine speed
>> and kernel options. It is working a bit too well at the moment:
>>
>> * user boots image with 2.6.26 kernel on an omap board
>> * user gets /dev/fb0
>> * user fixes the bootargs in uboot to enable the overlay
>> * user doesn't get /dev/fb1
>>
>> so remove /etc/dev.tar and reboot: /dev/fb1 appears.
>>
>> I also encountered a case where the permissions on /dev/null where wrong
>> during first boot (it's a mystery why that happened) and udev cached
>> those making ssh daemons fail on boot.
>>
>> My current ideas:
>>
>> 1) remove /etc/dev.tar if its>  x weeks old
>> 2) recreate it on shutdown
>> 3) remove it after x times
>>
>> option 1) breaks on systems without an RTC and/or no /etc/timestamp
>> option 2) moves the slowness to shutdown
>> option 3) requires extra logic and filesystem access
>>
>> and all options don't fix the first case I mentioned, they all take a
>> while to make /dev/fb1 appear.
>>
>> The key is that it should be transparent to users, so adding a check for
>> .e.g 'ignore_dev.tar=1' in bootargs wouldn't work, since that implies
>> that users are aware of the problem and know how to 'fix' it.
>>
>> Does anyone have other ways to invalidate the cache, and if not, which
>> option would get your vote?
>
> 2 is a different (and perhaps not as) slow.  Also, prepopulate the cache
> with fb1?  Or is this all done on the live system with nothing done
> during image creation?

It's done during first boot, since as the problem points out everything 
is highly dependant on bootloader/kernel/moonphase.

regards,

Koen




  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-04 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-04 16:05 invalidating udev cache, how? Koen Kooi
2008-12-04 16:15 ` Tom Rini
2008-12-04 17:35   ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2008-12-04 18:49     ` Tom Rini
2008-12-04 19:02       ` Koen Kooi
2008-12-04 19:17         ` Tom Rini
2008-12-04 16:35 ` Thomas Kunze
2008-12-04 17:03   ` Koen Kooi
2008-12-04 16:58 ` Mike (mwester)
2008-12-04 17:09   ` Mike (mwester)
2008-12-04 17:41     ` Koen Kooi
2008-12-04 18:50       ` Tom Rini
2009-03-03  5:11       ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-03-03  7:24         ` Koen Kooi
2009-03-03 15:16           ` Tom Rini
2008-12-04 17:11   ` Koen Kooi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='gh94cf$p59$2@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox