From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] gnome.bbclass change broke lots of package dependencies
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:21:00 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gvduus$cuo$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1243246822.4869.19.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com
Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 12:07 +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ inherit autotools gtk-icon-cache pkgconfig gconf mime
>>
>> AUTOTOOLS_STAGE_PKGCONFIG = "1"
>>
>> +PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-scrollkeeper-leftovers"
>> +FILES_${PN}-scrollkeeper-leftovers =
>> "${localstatedir}/lib/scrollkeeper" +
>> gnome_stage_includes() {
>> autotools_stage_includes
>> }
>>
>> As we can see, there is now ${PN}-scrollkeeper-leftovers package for
>> every recipe that inherited gnome.bbclass. And this -leftovers package
>> is in the current dependency chains (at least for qt4-embedded-dev
>> package).
>
> Where is your dependency on -scrollkeeper-leftovers coming from? Nothing
> in the patch that you quoted looks like it ought to be causing that.
>
> That said, the patch does look a bit bizarre: as a general rule we don't
> package things from ${localstatedir} since lots of targets have that as
> a ramdisk. It isn't obvious to me what this is going to achieve.
I can confirm the dependency part of this report. It's causing build
failures for me: see bug 5123. I've traced this to strange dependancies on
pango-scrollkeeper-leftovers from most of pango packages.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-25 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-25 9:07 [RFC] gnome.bbclass change broke lots of package dependencies Ihar Hrachyshka
2009-05-25 10:20 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-25 11:18 ` [PATCH] gnome.bbclass: remove unneeded scrollkeeper stuff from gnome packages Ihar Hrachyshka
2009-05-25 12:17 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-30 20:53 ` Tom Rini
2009-05-30 20:54 ` Tom Rini
2009-05-30 21:00 ` Ihar Hrachyshka
2009-05-30 21:04 ` Tom Rini
2009-05-30 23:06 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-30 23:42 ` Phil Blundell
2009-05-30 20:36 ` Ihar Hrachyshka
2009-05-25 11:21 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='gvduus$cuo$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox