Re: QA Goals for OpenEmbedded

[Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07-01-10 10:35, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2010/1/7 Graeme Gregory <dp@xora.org.uk>:
>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 09:50:36AM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>>> 2010/1/7 Graeme Gregory <dp@xora.org.uk>:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>>>>> allergic to COMPATIBLE_MACHINE for no particular reason).  Bitbake can't
>>>>> do versioned depends and so we can't say that $bb2-$version does not
>>>>> compile with gcc less than 3.4.x, for example.  Those are just two
>>>>> examples.  XorA "solved" this in a hackish way with angsstrom.bbclass.
>>>>>
>>>> No he didnt and no its not a hack. Its a blacklist of packages that for
>>>> various reasons Angstrom NEVER wants built.
>>>
>>> Should we have such a blacklist per machine?
>>> My sheevaplug rungs angstrom, but as it has no display it has no need
>>> for an X server, nor for ide or pci or sata tools.
>>>
>> It follows the standard overide rules (or should do) so you should
>> be able to blacklist per machine.
>>
>> Of course you chose a bad example as I know quite a few people are using
>> the sheeva with usb displaylink adapters.
> 
> Ah ok, I don't know any of them, but let's stay on safe grounds and
> take pci or sata tools as an example ;-)

You don't like usb2sata adaptors?

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLRawjMkyGM64RGpERAoFSAKCds8QU/tPv0gOIpDIshm1FZ/cJVQCgnoMl
3J3CPrd7P7UyYBDhCOebPfQ=
=cmr3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----