Re: RFC: Sane default for SPLASH

[Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 14-01-10 14:48, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Koen Kooi wrote:
>> NAK, the needless SPLASH -> BOOTSPLASH will create too much work for
>> people to catch up to, and it messes up the docs on the subject.
> 
> With respect to "needless", the reasons for the change were given in
> this thread.  Please revisit the discussion.

Phil only said short names might clash, which I don't think 'SPLASH'
will ever do.

> And in any case, the tremendous (LOL) amount of work can be
> significantly reduced with the help of sed, as I'm sure you are aware.

You are assuming I have write access to everywhere and know about every
overlay in existence.

> With regard to docs:
> 
> $ rgrep SPLASH docs/
> $
> 
> The wiki has nothing on it, either.  Nothing but hot air?

No, internal docs

> This has become a non-core change,

image.bbclass is considered 'core' or has that changed lately?

> I don't feel bound by your NAK.

If you don't feel bound by NAKs you shouldn't be sending patches for
review, one NAK is enough for it to get rejected.

> That
> being said, I know of your tendency of "my way or the highway" and have
> prepared a new patch that omits the name change but is otherwise
> identical.  Since this addresses your "concerns" I await your ACK.

The patch below looks good to me:

Acked-by: Koen Kooi <koen@openembedded.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLTyWjMkyGM64RGpERAiiiAJ4joUTu0ZqcGvukFTFSNsrmYk13OACgmhSj
BudTZxUtiG8ImtjfZ0HUOwA=
=Ix9Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----