From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYzcb-00035z-SG for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:23:12 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NYzaM-0003TG-Os for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:20:50 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:20:50 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:20:50 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:20:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1263760344-26105-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <1263763723.5353.16.camel@mattotaupa.wohnung.familie-menzel.net> <1263820243.3675.560.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> <1263824896.26227.112.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1264114415.457.1069.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <19c1b8a91001220813w46f8888ewcffb90df590bda93@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100113 Shredder/3.0.2pre In-Reply-To: <19c1b8a91001220813w46f8888ewcffb90df590bda93@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: include default PR or not X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:23:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 22-01-10 17:13, Khem Raj wrote: > IMO Letting PR=r0 is better because it does help people in remembering > to bump PR when they make the first change after r0 > afterall 0 is also a number so it does convey some information in the recipe. My experience is that people forget to bump PR regardless of PR = rX being present in the recipe and/or includes, that line of thinking is moot. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLXB7qMkyGM64RGpERAh9dAKCOEMCbtp+JMVdjqmpIJeAwO0sxuQCfXUbN 6ggZc7oVtJXYhraPeNIwSIw= =/Bkw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----