Re: samba-essential upgrade or remove?

[Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 15-03-10 04:46, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Monday 08 March 2010 13:51:35 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>> On Monday 08 March 2010 13:42:07 Dr. Michael Lauer wrote:
>>> While I'm not using it atm., I recall that samba-essential was the only
>>> recipe that worked relatively painless when Matthias Hentges create it
>>> back then.
>>
>> Then please fix it. You will do a great service to our users. The following
>> CVEs are not addressed:
>> 	CVE-2009-2813, CVE-2009-2948, CVE-2009-2906, CVE-2009-1888,
>> CVE-2008-4314, CVE-2008-1105, CVE-2007-6015, CVS-2007-4572,  CVE-2007-5398,
>> CVE-2007-2444, CVE-2007-2446, CVE-2007-2447, CVE-2007-0452, CVE-2007-0453,
>> CVE-2007-0454, CAN-2006-1059..
> 
> 
> any update? Is anyone volunteering to update samba-essential or shall we 
> remove it from the tree? 

I think samba-essential reason of being can be done in regular samba
recipes by putting some better thought in PACKAGES and FILES. So: delete
this.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLnfWHMkyGM64RGpERAtouAJsHvBK9hBNaAwzz7k1hCa43rfajZACeJ8hc
OyoJWdOnb8+pAvkwoRwLCU4=
=bz/f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----