Re: Request for branch merge

[Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01-04-10 22:34, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 13:03 -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 01-04-10 17:33, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>
>>>> I could post the patches individually and get Acked lines for each one
>>>> but I'm hoping to avoid that and get permission to merge the branch
>>>> directly. We have talked about most of these things in one form or
>>>> another.
>>>
>>> I don't think this will get serious review people other than Tom, Khem
>>> and Chris, so if they don't have huge objections, merge it and we'll
>>> deal with the fallout together if needed.
>>
>>
>> I agree with Koen on this, it's a definite improvement. Let's get it merged
>> and deal with any fallout from there.
> 
> Generally yes, and just a few things to hash out over the weekend I
> think.

I'm going to steal Chris' thunder a bit, but during the TSC meeting we
agreed that "after the weekend" would be a better time to merge it than
"now". Dealing with the fallout required lots of attention, which boils
down to "office hours" for most of the involved.

regards,

Koen

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLtQtIMkyGM64RGpERAlNGAJsGhBaNRG6MrYu9b22xQ/u2gHixEQCgqfbK
yFuD52fo3laqE1HJU/qpktI=
=ShXS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----