From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1Q4zTz-0002DL-Ji for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:47:03 +0200
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1Q4zS5-0007mO-9z for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:45:05 +0200
Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:45:05 +0200
Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1
	(Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:45:05 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
From: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:42:09 +0200
Message-ID: <imvq1h$8hl$2@dough.gmane.org>
References: <AANLkTi=r1KzyDtTfZ74f0ZhJVpo=cTZV5n_azfAKQEHt@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101127 Shredder/3.0.11pre
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=r1KzyDtTfZ74f0ZhJVpo=cTZV5n_azfAKQEHt@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Add support for the Technologic Systems TS7500 ARM SBCs
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:47:03 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 30-03-11 18:40, R.T. McGee wrote:
> Its true, the FA526 is not a ARM920T but it's a bit different from other
> standard ARMv4 types.
> 
> Comments about the FA526 and ARM920T similarity are based on work like this:
> http://openocd.sourcearchive.com/lines/0.3.1/fa526_8c-source.html
> This are not from the perspective of the instruction set, but it more or
> less talking about hardware features.

So it's more like a ARM920?

> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNk2twMkyGM64RGpERAu6YAKC02zPo1mZcM8MOiys2fNrxdFPu3gCgoNay
H6ZSLNVdA4kadZYqvWAqoeA=
=b62T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----