From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RObMG-0006EG-ME for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:36:24 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RObG9-00081q-Lf for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:30:05 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:30:05 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:30:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:25:24 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4EBBE67F.20300@freyther.de> <20111110185732.GC20602@denix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: <20111110185732.GC20602@denix.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Subject: Re: RFC Creation of a meta-telephony repository X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:36:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 10-11-11 19:57, Denys Dmytriyenko schreef: >> Op 10-11-11 15:58, Holger Freyther schreef: >>> Hi all, sysadmins, >>> >>> could someone create a meta-telephony repository for me? >> >> Why not use github/gitorious/etc for it? > > Do you have a hidden anti-OpenEmbedded agenda here? ;-) > > Seriously though, why is it better than oe.org hosting? It has less constraints. You should know, since you were the one telling me that oe.org is resource constrained and we can't host too many layers. I haven't seen enough reason to place the burden for this layer on the OE admin team instead of doing 'self' hosting on gitorious/github/etc/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFOvDM0MkyGM64RGpERAqoBAKCjVDqjsjmYJOhRVkU+YWh4TlOGWACfZnvx WETbx98dV+/px3ofKTEHN2w= =YzlL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----