From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ROoie-00042o-7N for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:52:24 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ROoca-00088F-FK for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:46:08 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:46:08 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:46:08 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:45:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4EBBE67F.20300@freyther.de> <20111110185732.GC20602@denix.org> <20111110210133.GD20602@denix.org> <4EBCEE8B.10802@freyther.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4EBCEE8B.10802@freyther.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Subject: Re: RFC Creation of a meta-telephony repository X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:52:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 11-11-11 10:44, Holger Freyther schreef: > On 11/10/2011 10:01 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>> I haven't seen enough reason to place the burden for this layer on >>> the OE admin team instead of doing 'self' hosting on >>> gitorious/github/etc/ >> >> Well, first of all, when we had constrained resources at oe.org, we >> were trying to limit the number of commercial layers, assuming that the >> company behind such layer is well capable of providing hosting for >> their product. That would mean BSP layers from semis, like Intel, TI, >> Freescale etc. or commercial distro layers from OSVs, such as Mentor, >> Montavista etc. We always welcomed community layers on oe.org, even BSP >> layers for platforms that had no official commercial support, but also >> distro, apps and other layers, as long as they had "supported by >> community" status. > > Okay, > > i don't mind hosting this myself (either gitorious or really myself). > The reason to ask for hosting it on OE was making it easier to > collaborate with OE members and making it more easy to find the > repository. Having worked with layers for quite a while now I go through the following list before creating one: Does it need to be a layer? -> no -> send patches to existing layers | yes | Does it need to be a seperate repo? -> no -> send patches to existing repos | yes | Is github/gitorious/etc good enough? -> no -> ... | yes | Create repo + layer And after a I while re-evaluate it. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFOvPzgMkyGM64RGpERAjNiAJ4114dbMzlf07Jsa4IeGGmhxX1n2QCfchcF PmSc2wSo80JoBXbPHZo5PgM= =ulrG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----