From: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Plans for OE classic future
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:45:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jalvr1$3bl$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKrKN3m_V09j6+C1dL9P8yHtuck4P5jcdKv4Ua=mrP1E=Q@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Op 24-11-11 12:43, Otavio Salvador schreef:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:33, Paul Menzel <
> paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>> Am Donnerstag, den 24.11.2011, 09:12 -0200 schrieb Otavio Salvador:
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:23, Hauser, Wolfgang (external) wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would vote for an open classic master for bugfixing too, our
>>>> project based on 2011.03-maintenance goes into the final phase and
>>>> to switch to oe-core, the budged is not available jet.
>>>
>>> I also believe oe-classic master ought to be read-only as soon as
>> possible;
>>> I understand that people are using it but the soonner we make it
>> read-only,
>>> sooner people will move to oe-core otherwise people will keep
>>> starting
>> new
>>> project on it and it will never die.
>>
>> You seem to use OE-core and meta-oe already so I understand your point
>> of view. Martin, Koen, Andreas and you are doing the major work for
>> meta-oe and not a lot of other people contribute.
>>
>> In my opinion it is a bad sign to force people to switch. OE-core and
>> meta-oe should be so appealing that they switch by themselves. My
>> impression from reading the list and from IRC is that a lot of people
>> still have objections and are not totally comfortable. Good community
>> management would be to listen to these people then try to find
>> solutions and implement them. People then should come by themselves.
>>
>
> In fact I use both. The projects running at oe-classic are working well
> and will be kept running that way but all new ones are based on oe-core
> + meta-oe.
With both my angstrom and TI hat on: I use both 2011.03-maintenance and OE-core.
> I am not against oe-classic maintainence branch and people contributting
> new fixes but I am against the work on new features and recipes being
> put on master branch.
Exactly!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iEYEARECAAYFAk7OgqAACgkQMkyGM64RGpF3TgCfWAfwcn7rIZD4cdfHVf1GQW1h
PiIAnRrWDAeKvSeSoitXe8JC3ZJsnRY0
=9/Cy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-24 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AcyUlp+U2Tnulhz/TiaFJRlWYsvGkw==>
2011-10-27 10:53 ` Plans for OE classic future Mats Kärrman
2011-10-27 11:56 ` Henning Heinold
2011-10-27 12:27 ` Martin Jansa
2011-11-01 0:38 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-11-01 1:00 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2011-11-01 7:13 ` Jaap de Jong
2011-11-01 10:39 ` Henning Heinold
2011-10-27 17:44 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2011-10-27 23:56 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-23 20:46 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-23 21:18 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-23 21:30 ` Philip Balister
2011-11-26 21:12 ` Bernhard Guillon
2011-11-27 9:15 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-23 22:25 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-23 22:42 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-11-24 8:03 ` Mats Kärrman
2011-11-24 10:23 ` Hauser, Wolfgang (external)
2011-11-24 11:12 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-24 11:24 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-24 11:37 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-24 11:33 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-24 11:43 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-24 17:45 ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2011-11-25 5:23 ` Raffaele Recalcati
2011-11-25 7:31 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-25 10:45 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-25 22:04 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 10:57 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-11-26 15:20 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 15:49 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-26 21:36 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 22:01 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-26 22:33 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 22:49 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-27 2:37 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 9:46 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-27 10:12 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-27 17:05 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 17:25 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-27 18:25 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 21:58 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-28 2:25 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 22:37 ` Raffaele Recalcati
2011-11-26 22:44 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-27 2:26 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 18:53 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-11-26 21:47 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-24 11:43 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-11-24 17:47 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-24 18:15 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-11-24 9:12 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-24 9:31 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-24 17:06 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-24 17:41 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-11-24 18:43 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-25 13:17 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-11-25 22:00 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-24 20:33 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-25 21:43 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 16:11 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-26 21:43 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-25 21:52 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 3:49 ` Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
2011-11-26 15:45 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-26 16:56 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-26 21:28 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 9:55 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-27 17:15 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='jalvr1$3bl$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox