From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPqwC-0002yq-Mw for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 09:58:56 +0200 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPqmm-0000FS-Ha for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 09:49:12 +0200 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 09:49:12 +0200 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 09:49:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 09:48:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4F9A932F.1020400@gmail.com> <4F9F8630.3070901@gmail.com> <4FA0FFD5.6080201@gmail.com> <4FA1A1C8.3030705@gmail.com> <4FA22A58.3040100@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4FA22A58.3040100@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Subject: Re: Openembedded and ld-linux-armhf.so.3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 07:58:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 03-05-12 08:48, Martin Ertsås schreef: > On 05/02/12 23:06, Khem Raj wrote: >> On 05/02/2012 02:35 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote: >>> The patches posted seems to be working fine. I at least didn't have >>> any problems with them. >> >> >> thanks for trying them out. GCC patch is final but eglibc patch I still >> got to improve that its not final version yet. > > No problem. Is there also plans for renaming the toolchains created to > arm-none-linux-gnueabihf when using hardfloats? What's the point in that? Renaming the toolchain won't grant it magical powers and setting a targetvendor is perfectly valid. I've seen too many presentations this year at ELC and Collab where someone says "renaming the toolchain fixed it" when they actually mean "using a bare-metal toolchain for userspace doesn't really work". Just look at the building the kernel with LLVM talk, a third of Marks presentation was about challenges with calling the right toolchain with the right arguments. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPojhnAAoJEHZqAkdh1vT63s0P/2yoPsNlXRcLHGfeH7SCtEHP 2fxZMUmxRzZjPF/rwqWCBwyHEseGtL15AfetHK2Ylvi+Pzw0Z+d5GpNlzwj4pBNo JguZ6+4xo6Kd0mKxk9PN99ebcPYsQo23Hqs6Bpk6roYJNoBtmqUusZ/M0VoS+k/E 7KwUwYUjL1mONDpKWjPkuC2apkjjI/XQ/a9r0RlQ8qzKaMJDg8rJkRFV8Yzzrlxu 0DRjs+EyTjM/VUGXTxdnjsQwV4lbZC0bw9rZhISsXwG5JFEJVjkZ9pMMexqkAX7C pE6YBWxAZ8g3ZAWd9AVwne4xR99xCPtYyqVr3smeEi+mxu+SLkZFaZvyFLhHsaBj uRM9sKinrnnUdpWxCZ4qoNJ4j0h2tT7/wqBXsNyK5+0XmfJba58ZfyY2t8xSi4qn d89gQ/iYTHCDpW+7Rogp5WNzhS2Y8a+ecvbP1zQHZitEfaA4TXUxB1x9hsqWVuT8 2RbVAIMgytCrj9sshdlAaWkFReF7CKSp7zMwn3FLCKFPLSsS7P260MQRWqpGJXjS yPTaFgFeWBRbSOMtg8l2LP5gDVuyg1BrdmiRVycX/gOgj4ZTfMPOooyAWttVMj95 4cZO1yiCU4de8Fd2+8QW4KrUJhnKcI+pHZn0pP4qHMuKUoh+o0dbCz/O7OCK9now VqIPweynKVrQ5SF8ZhYa =F3G4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----