Re: [meta-browser] Question regarding status of chromium recipes

[Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 25-10-12 20:01, Chris Larson schreef:
> Greetings,
> 
> I'm wondering if the chromium recipes in this layer have ever been build
> tested. As far as I can tell, both 19 and 20 are missing dependencies on
> udev (libudev), gtk+, and gconf, and 20 also wants the openssl headers.
> 19 also fails due to an attempt to build/link a native tool requiring
> libxi, so it seems it can't be built without x11 headers on the build
> machine (along with the odd ld.gold requirement). Given these issues, I
> figured I'd throw out a contact email and try to determine if perhaps the
> OSSystems folks have local changes that never made it into the public
> layer, or if the recipes just didn't get a great deal of testing.
> 
> Thanks, I'd appreciate any input on their status :)

Nice timing, I just received a request for a working chromium build and I
ran into similar if not the same issues :)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFQibx8MkyGM64RGpERAuWWAJ9ooRxIMeMmyWCAT5gCkfYjrx05NwCgso/G
hWVMQT8AZkx2MOXqsr+xARc=
=2i+V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----