public inbox for openrisc@lists.librecores.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [RFC 02/32] Kconfig: introduce HAS_IOPORT option and select it as necessary
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 12:28:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <072b9080be4a408052bf2c2cc1a9be0089cce5cc.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0211719b-8402-9865-8e5d-5c0a35715816@gmail.com>

On Thu, 2021-12-30 at 16:44 +1300, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> Am 30.12.2021 um 14:48 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 11:15 PM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Am 29.12.2021 um 16:41 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 8:20 PM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com> wrote:
---8<---
> 
> > What some other architectures do is to rely on inb()/outb() to have a
> > zero-based offset, and use an io_offset in PCI buses to ensure that a
> > low port number on the bus gets translated into a pointer value for the
> > virtual mapping in the kernel, which is then represented as an unsigned
> > int.
> 
> M54xx does just that for Coldfire:
> 
> arch/m68k/include/asm/io_no.h:
> #define PCI_IO_PA	0xf8000000		/* Host physical address */
> 
> (used to set PCI BAR mappings, so matches your definition above).
> 
> All other (MMU) m68k users of inb()/outb() apply an io_offset in the 
> platform specific address translation:
> 
> 
---8<---
> So as long as support for any of the m68k PCI or ISA bridges is selected 
> in the kernel config, the appropriate IO space mapping is applied. If no 
> support for PCI or ISA bridges is selected, we already fall back to zero 
> offset mapping (but as far as I can tell, it shouldn't be possible to 
> build a kernel without bridge support but drivers that require it).
> 
> > As this is indistinguishable from architectures that just don't have
> > a base address for I/O ports (we unfortunately picked 0 as the default
> > PCI_IOBASE value), my suggestion was to start marking architectures
> > that may have this problem as using HAS_IOPORT in order to keep
> > the existing behavior unchanged. If m68k does not suffer from this,
> > making HAS_IOPORT conditional on those config options that actually
> > need it would of course be best.
> 
> Following your description, HAS_IOPORT would be required for neither of 
> PCI, ISA or ATARI_ROM_ISA ??
> 

No, HAS_IOPORT being set just means that inb() etc. exist and are
functional be it as special instructions like on x86 or via an I/O
address offset. As I understand it if you do have PCI, ISA or
ATARI_ROM_ISA they are functional. If none of them are set and your
zero offset mapping means these accessors can't actually be used you
could make the declerations ifdeffed on CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT to detect the
cases where somone managed to build drivers that require them and that
would result in a compile time error instead of silently, or with a
NULL pointer warning, compiling code that won't work.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-31 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20211227164317.4146918-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
2021-12-27 16:42 ` [OpenRISC] [RFC 02/32] Kconfig: introduce HAS_IOPORT option and select it as necessary Niklas Schnelle
2021-12-28 10:08   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-12-29  1:20     ` Michael Schmitz
2021-12-29  3:41       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-29  4:15         ` Michael Schmitz
2021-12-30  1:48           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-30  3:44             ` Michael Schmitz
2021-12-31 11:28               ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2021-12-31 16:04               ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-31 21:55                 ` Michael Schmitz
2021-12-28 16:32   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=072b9080be4a408052bf2c2cc1a9be0089cce5cc.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox