From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:46:44 -0700
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v2 1/2] treewide: remove unused address
 argument from pte_alloc functions
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810121838180.4366@hadrien>
References: <20181012013756.11285-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <594fc952-5e87-3162-b2f9-963479d16eb3@kot-begemot.co.uk>
 <20181012163433.GA223066@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810121838180.4366@hadrien>
Message-ID: <20181012164644.GC223066@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>
List-Id: <openrisc.lists.librecores.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:38:57PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > I wrote something like this as below but it failed to compile, Julia any
> > suggestions on how to express this?
> >
> > @pte_alloc_func_proto depends on patch exists@
> > type T1, T2, T3, T4;
> > identifier fn =~
> > "^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$";
> > @@
> >
> > (
> > - T3 fn(T1, T2);
> > + T3 fn(T1);
> > |
> > - T3 fn(T1, T2, T4);
> > + T3 fn(T1, T2);
> > )
> 
> What goes wrong?  It seems fine to me.

Weird it seems working now. I could swear 5 minutes ago it wasn't and I did
give a unique rule name. Don't know what I missed.

Anyway, thank you for all the quick responses and the help!

- Joel