From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 19:37:19 +0900
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack()
In-Reply-To: <20191106083538.z5nlpuf64cigxigh@pathway.suse.cz>
References: <20191106030542.868541-1-dima@arista.com>
 <20191106083538.z5nlpuf64cigxigh@pathway.suse.cz>
Message-ID: <20191108103719.GB175344@google.com>
List-Id: <openrisc.lists.librecores.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org

On (19/11/06 09:35), Petr Mladek wrote:
> I agree with all the other justification.
> 
> I would add. The backtrace is really useful for debugging. It should
> be possible to print it even in less critical situations.

Hmm, I don't know.
Do we really need debug/info level backtraces? May be all backtraces
can be converted to something more severe (so we can stop playing games
with loglvl) and then we can clean up "(ab)users"?

	-ss