public inbox for openrisc@lists.librecores.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 09/17] memblock: make memblock_debug and related functionality private
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:48:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200819204848.GX752365@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200819122405.88e9719e86ac7c3c44b4db32@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 12:24:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:16:26 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > The only user of memblock_dbg() outside memblock was s390 setup code and it
> > is converted to use pr_debug() instead.
> > This allows to stop exposing memblock_debug and memblock_dbg() to the rest
> > of the kernel.
> > 
> > --- a/mm/memblock.c
> > +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> > @@ -137,7 +137,10 @@ struct memblock_type physmem = {
> >  	     i < memblock_type->cnt;					\
> >  	     i++, rgn = &memblock_type->regions[i])
> >  
> > -int memblock_debug __initdata_memblock;
> > +#define memblock_dbg(fmt, ...) \
> > +	if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +
> 
> checkpatch doesn't like this much.
> 
> ERROR: Macros starting with if should be enclosed by a do - while loop to avoid possible if/else logic defects
> #101: FILE: mm/memblock.c:140:
> +#define memblock_dbg(fmt, ...) \
> +	if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> 
> WARNING: Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_info([subsystem]dev, ... then dev_info(dev, ... then pr_info(...  to printk(KERN_INFO ...
> #102: FILE: mm/memblock.c:141:
> +	if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> 
> ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
> #102: FILE: mm/memblock.c:141:
> +	if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> 
> 
> The first one is significant:
> 
> 	if (foo)
> 		memblock_dbg(...);
> 	else
> 		save_the_world();
> 
> could end up inadvertently destroying the planet.

Well, it didn't till now ;-)

> This?
> 
> --- a/mm/memblock.c~memblock-make-memblock_debug-and-related-functionality-private-fix
> +++ a/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -137,8 +137,11 @@ struct memblock_type physmem = {
>  	     i < memblock_type->cnt;					\
>  	     i++, rgn = &memblock_type->regions[i])
>  
> -#define memblock_dbg(fmt, ...) \
> -	if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +#define memblock_dbg(fmt, ...)						\
> +	do {								\
> +		if (memblock_debug)					\
> +			pr_info(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);			\
> +	} while (0)

Sure, thanks!

>  static int memblock_debug __initdata_memblock;
>  static bool system_has_some_mirror __initdata_memblock = false;
> _
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-19 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-18 15:16 [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 00/17] memblock: seasonal cleaning^w cleanup Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 01/17] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: simplify kvm_cma_reserve() Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 02/17] dma-contiguous: simplify cma_early_percent_memory() Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 03/17] arm, xtensa: simplify initialization of high memory pages Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 04/17] arm64: numa: simplify dummy_numa_init() Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 05/17] h8300, nds32, openrisc: simplify detection of memory extents Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 06/17] riscv: drop unneeded node initialization Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 07/17] mircoblaze: drop unneeded NUMA and sparsemem initializations Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 08/17] memblock: make for_each_memblock_type() iterator private Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 09/17] memblock: make memblock_debug and related functionality private Mike Rapoport
2020-08-19 19:24   ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-19 20:48     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 10/17] memblock: reduce number of parameters in for_each_mem_range() Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 22:18   ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 11/17] arch, mm: replace for_each_memblock() with for_each_mem_pfn_range() Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 12/17] arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range() Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 13/17] x86/setup: simplify initrd relocation and reservation Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 14/17] x86/setup: simplify reserve_crashkernel() Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 15/17] memblock: remove unused memblock_mem_size() Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 16/17] memblock: implement for_each_reserved_mem_region() using __next_mem_region() Mike Rapoport
2020-08-18 15:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 17/17] memblock: use separate iterators for memory and reserved regions Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200819204848.GX752365@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox