From: Himanshu Chauhan <hchauhan@ventanamicro.com>
To: opensbi@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] lib: sbi: Use finer permission semantics for address validation
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:16:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221220104625.80667-3-hchauhan@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221220104625.80667-1-hchauhan@ventanamicro.com>
Use the fine grained permisssion semantics for address validation
of a given region.
Signed-off-by: Himanshu Chauhan <hchauhan@ventanamicro.com>
---
lib/sbi/sbi_domain.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_domain.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_domain.c
index 3205595..8f9306c 100644
--- a/lib/sbi/sbi_domain.c
+++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_domain.c
@@ -107,24 +107,33 @@ bool sbi_domain_check_addr(const struct sbi_domain *dom,
{
bool rmmio, mmio = FALSE;
struct sbi_domain_memregion *reg;
- unsigned long rstart, rend, rflags, rwx = 0;
+ unsigned long rstart, rend, rflags, rwx = 0, rrwx = 0;
if (!dom)
return FALSE;
+ /*
+ * Use M_{R/W/X} bits because the SU-bits are at the
+ * same relative offsets. If the mode is not M, the SU
+ * bits will fall at same offsets after the shift.
+ */
if (access_flags & SBI_DOMAIN_READ)
- rwx |= SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_READABLE;
+ rwx |= SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_READABLE;
+
if (access_flags & SBI_DOMAIN_WRITE)
- rwx |= SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_WRITEABLE;
+ rwx |= SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_WRITABLE;
+
if (access_flags & SBI_DOMAIN_EXECUTE)
- rwx |= SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_EXECUTABLE;
+ rwx |= SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_EXECUTABLE;
+
if (access_flags & SBI_DOMAIN_MMIO)
mmio = TRUE;
sbi_domain_for_each_memregion(dom, reg) {
rflags = reg->flags;
- if (mode == PRV_M && !(rflags & SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_MMODE))
- continue;
+ rrwx = (mode == PRV_M ? (rflags & SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_ACCESS_MASK)
+ : (rflags & SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_ACCESS_MASK)
+ >> SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_ACCESS_SHIFT);
rstart = reg->base;
rend = (reg->order < __riscv_xlen) ?
@@ -133,7 +142,7 @@ bool sbi_domain_check_addr(const struct sbi_domain *dom,
rmmio = (rflags & SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_MMIO) ? TRUE : FALSE;
if (mmio != rmmio)
return FALSE;
- return ((rflags & rwx) == rwx) ? TRUE : FALSE;
+ return ((rrwx & rwx) == rwx) ? TRUE : FALSE;
}
}
--
2.39.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-20 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-20 10:46 [PATCH 0/9] Split region permissions into M-mode and SU-mode Himanshu Chauhan
2022-12-20 10:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] include: sbi: Fine grain the permissions for M and SU modes Himanshu Chauhan
2023-01-06 17:35 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-09 4:43 ` hchauhan
2023-01-09 5:19 ` Anup Patel
2022-12-20 10:46 ` Himanshu Chauhan [this message]
2023-01-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 2/9] lib: sbi: Use finer permission semantics for address validation Anup Patel
2022-12-20 10:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] lib: sbi: Add permissions for the firmware start till end Himanshu Chauhan
2023-01-06 17:44 ` Anup Patel
2022-12-20 10:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] lib: sbi: Use finer permission sematics to decide on PMP bits Himanshu Chauhan
2023-01-06 17:45 ` Anup Patel
2022-12-20 10:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] lib: sbi: Modify the boot time region flag prints Himanshu Chauhan
2023-01-06 17:47 ` Anup Patel
2022-12-20 10:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] lib: utils: Use SU-{R/W/X} flags for region permissions during parsing Himanshu Chauhan
2023-01-06 17:49 ` Anup Patel
2022-12-20 10:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] lib: utils: Disallow non-root domains from adding M-mode regions Himanshu Chauhan
2023-01-06 17:51 ` Anup Patel
2022-12-20 10:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] lib: utils: Add M-mode {R/W} flags to the MMIO regions Himanshu Chauhan
2023-01-06 17:52 ` Anup Patel
2022-12-20 10:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] docs: Update domain's region permissions and requirements Himanshu Chauhan
2023-01-06 17:54 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221220104625.80667-3-hchauhan@ventanamicro.com \
--to=hchauhan@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=opensbi@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox