[RFC PATCH 04/11] lib: sbi_hsm: Move misplaced comment

[Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>]

While non-retentive suspend is not allowed for M-mode, the comment
at the top of sbi_hsm_hart_suspend() implied suspend wasn't allowed
for M-mode at all. Move the comment above the mode check which is
inside a suspend type is non-retentive check.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c
index 3635f968e020..cce4b07bbb36 100644
--- a/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c
+++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c
@@ -399,8 +399,6 @@ int sbi_hsm_hart_suspend(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, u32 suspend_type,
 	struct sbi_hsm_data *hdata = sbi_scratch_offset_ptr(scratch,
 							    hart_data_offset);
 
-	/* For now, we only allow suspend from S-mode or U-mode. */
-
 	/* Sanity check on domain assigned to current HART */
 	if (!dom)
 		return SBI_EFAIL;
@@ -415,6 +413,10 @@ int sbi_hsm_hart_suspend(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, u32 suspend_type,
 
 	/* Additional sanity check for non-retentive suspend */
 	if (suspend_type & SBI_HSM_SUSP_NON_RET_BIT) {
+		/*
+		 * For now, we only allow non-retentive suspend from
+		 * S-mode or U-mode.
+		 */
 		if (rmode != PRV_S && rmode != PRV_U)
 			return SBI_EFAIL;
 		if (dom && !sbi_domain_check_addr(dom, raddr, rmode,
-- 
2.39.0