From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: opensbi@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] lib: sbi: Add additional range checks for RV32
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:00:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240826-e18e6c0b91536fe454490d16@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhSdy2DrwQ94GgOAtAodQ=hxGog8ovmjoR+9+RnXCMx2bmfWw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 02:38:31PM GMT, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 6:02?PM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> >
> > On RV32, M-mode can only access the first 4G of the physical
> > address space because M-mode does not have an MMU to access the
> > full 34-bit physical address space. While we already ensure
> > the "hi" registers of RV32 physical address inputs are zero we
> > need to also ensure that the low register plus the size does
> > not cross into 4G address space. The check added to
> > sbi_domain_check_addr_range() should be enough for both DBCN
> > and SSE, but DBCN returns a different error code for high
> > addresses, so we patch that check too.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Should the SSE functions return SBI_ERR_FAILED in this case like DBCN
> > does? We'd need to patch the SSE spec to call out SBI_ERR_FAILED as
> > "Failed to write due to I/O errors." like DBCN does too.
>
> Instead of special-casing wrap-around check separately for each SBI
> extension, I suggest:
> 1) Add one more requirement in section 3.2 of the SBI spec to prevent
> wrap-around
> 2) Update sbi_domain_check_addr_range() like this patch does.
Sounds good to me.
Thanks,
drew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-14 12:30 [PATCH] lib: sbi: Add additional range checks for RV32 Andrew Jones
2024-08-24 9:08 ` Anup Patel
2024-08-26 11:00 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2024-09-09 13:21 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240826-e18e6c0b91536fe454490d16@orel \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=opensbi@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox