From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 15:08:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Makefile: Force GNU hashing
In-Reply-To: <5c7a4dce-60fe-e61f-1596-20378d5204d1@ventanamicro.com> (Jeff
	Law's message of "Mon, 14 Aug 2023 07:06:28 -0600")
References: <20230814043959.390101-1-mchitale@ventanamicro.com>
	<mvmwmxydqbn.fsf@suse.de>
	<5c7a4dce-60fe-e61f-1596-20378d5204d1@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <mvmil9hdb5a.fsf@suse.de>
List-Id: <opensbi.lists.infradead.org>
To: opensbi@lists.infradead.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Aug 14 2023, Jeff Law wrote:

> On 8/14/23 01:40, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Aug 14 2023, Mayuresh Chitale wrote:
>> 
>>> The Yocto QA step verifies that binaries and DSOs use DT_GNU_HASH rather than
>>> DT_HASH. If the linker is called directly, then we need to make sure to pass in
>>> the hashing style.
>> Why does it matter?  The ultimate output is a flat binary.
> It matters because the Yocto QA step will fail.

Why does it even look at it?  It's only an intermediate build product.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab at suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."