public inbox for outreachy@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, julia.lawall@inria.fr,
	outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	david.laight.linux@gmail.com, andy@kernel.org,
	dan.carpenter@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v5] staging: rtl8723bs: Use % 4096u instead of & 0xfff
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 15:54:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z/PyMXTjCHduOhKX@HP-650> (raw)

The sequence number is constrained to a range of [0, 4095], which
is a total of 4096 values. The bitmask operation using `& 0xfff` is
used to perform this wrap-around. While this is functionally correct,
it obscures the intended semantic of a 4096-based wrap.

Using a modulo operation `% 4096u` makes the wrap-around logic
explicit and easier to understand. It clearly signals that the
sequence number cycles through a range of 4096 values.
It also makes the code robust against potential changes of the 4096
upper limit, especially when it becomes a non power of 2 value while
the AND(&) works solely for power of 2 values.

The use of `% 4096u` also guarantees that the modulo operation is
performed with unsigned arithmetic, preventing potential issues with
the signed types.

Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v4:
	- Corrected patch to use '%' instead of '&'
	- To ensure this change does not affect the functional
	behaviour, I compared the generated object files before and
	after the change using the `cmp` which compares the two
	object files byte by byte as shown below:

	$ make drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.o
	$ cmp rtw_xmit_before.o rtw_xmit_after.o

	No differences were found in the output, confirming that the
	change does not alter the compiled output.
Changes in v3:
	- Added more description to the commit message.
	- Removed blank line in the tag block.
	- Added more patch recipients.
Changes in v2:
	- Changed the commit message t a more descriptive message which
	makes it clear why the patch does the change.
	- changed the subject title to include `4096u` to show that an
	unsigned module is used.
Changes in v1:
	- Added more patch recipients.

 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
index 026061b464f7..548fcf9968bd 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ s32 rtw_make_wlanhdr(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *hdr, struct pkt_attrib *pattr
 
 			if (psta) {
 				psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority]++;
-				psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority] &= 0xFFF;
+				psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority] %= 4096u;
 				pattrib->seqnum = psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority];
 
 				SetSeqNum(hdr, pattrib->seqnum);
@@ -963,11 +963,11 @@ s32 rtw_make_wlanhdr(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *hdr, struct pkt_attrib *pattr
 					if (SN_LESS(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
 						pattrib->ampdu_en = false;/* AGG BK */
 					} else if (SN_EQUAL(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
-						psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (tx_seq+1)&0xfff;
+						psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (tx_seq+1)%4096u;
 
 						pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
 					} else {
-						psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (pattrib->seqnum+1)&0xfff;
+						psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (pattrib->seqnum+1)%4096u;
 						pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
 					}
 				}
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-04-07 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-07 15:54 Abraham Samuel Adekunle [this message]
2025-04-07 16:16 ` [PATCH v5] staging: rtl8723bs: Use % 4096u instead of & 0xfff Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 20:58   ` Samuel Abraham
2025-04-09 14:06   ` Samuel Abraham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z/PyMXTjCHduOhKX@HP-650 \
    --to=abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox