Re: [PATCH] Remove a duplicate 'not'

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:33:25AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

Good catch, applied, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  defer/toyrcu.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/defer/toyrcu.tex b/defer/toyrcu.tex
> index 9ec2963..220dfbe 100644
> --- a/defer/toyrcu.tex
> +++ b/defer/toyrcu.tex
> @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ Despite these shortcomings, one could imagine this variant
>  of RCU being used on small tightly coupled multiprocessors,
>  perhaps as a memory-conserving implementation that maintains
>  API compatibility with more complex implementations.
> -However, it would not not likely scale well beyond a few CPUs.
> +However, it would not likely scale well beyond a few CPUs.
> 
>  The next section describes yet another variation on the reference-counting
>  scheme that provides greatly improved read-side performance and scalability.
> -- 
> 2.2.2
>