From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] runlatex.sh: Fix while loop condition
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:28:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160422152841.GC3756@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571A3328.6020901@gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:20:24PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2016/04/22 06:34 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:58:24PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >> On 2016/04/22 16:54 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Oh, I miss-converted the date. This should have been "On 2016/04/21 16:54 -0700."
>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >>>> Can you try this one?
> >>>> Thanks, Akira
> >>>
> >>> I did, though for some reason I had to hand-apply it on my test branch.
> >>> Not sure what "git apply" didn't like.
> >>
> >> Well, I'm afraid you tried to apply it after [PATCH 2/2] applied.
> >> I should have made it clear it was a diff from master at that moment.
> >> Sorry for your trouble.
> >
> > I am pretty sure that I was applying it to the current master,
> > but I cannot prove anything at this point. ;-)
> >
> >>> It does repeat upon undefined, which is good. Nicer behavior after
> >>> bibliography changes!
> >>>
> >>> There is another "Fatal latex error" earlier that I missed, and it would
> >>> be good to have an "exit 1" on that one as well.
> >>>
> >>> The one thing I am still concerned about is a real undefined reference,
> >>> which would consume a full five iterations. Not really sure what would
> >>> be improved behavior, though. Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Thanx, Paul
> >>
> >> So your question is why you need to change the maximum value from 4 to 5,
> >> isn't it? That's because the count is checked at the end of the loop,
> >> and even when the 4th round of pdflatex is successful, the check will
> >> fire and 'make' will regard it as an error. At such a later stage,
> >> remaining warning should only be 'LaTeX Warning: Label(s) may have changed',
> >> if any.
> >
> > Yes, I do understand that. Your (very welcome!) changes to the quick-quiz
> > links can require additional passes through latex. Therefore, the script
> > should change to provide this.
> >
> > To see what I am getting at, please add a "\ref{this is a typo}" or a
> > reference to any other non-\label string, then type "make". This is a
> > pure error that no number of reruns will fix, but the build script will
> > nevertheless crank away multiple times.
> >
> > Before, it would run bibtex and stop. (Which, I freely admit, wasn't
> > particularly good behavior either!)
> >
> > My question is whether it is possible to make the script let the user
> > know why it is re-running latex, so that the user can choose to kill
> > it early, if appropriate. Or, alternatively (and for extra credit!),
> > recognize which labels are undefined, and do more passes if they are
> > quick-quiz links.
>
> I see. I'll try to add those features and improve the behavior. I'm not sure
> how far I can do, but please wait for a while. And thank you so much for
> your valuable suggestions.
Sounds very good! Thank you for your work thus far on improving the
quick-quiz links, and I look forward to seeing your patches!
> Regards, Akira
>
> >> So I made a fairly invasive modification to the script so that the count
> >> is checked at the beginning of the loop. Also the loop is separated for each
> >> of the warning message.
> >>
> >> Appended is the whole source code of the script (without the comment part at
> >> the head). I'm not sure which point should I make a diff from. Note that
> >> I truncated the warning messages given to grep. They should be long enough.
> >
> > Good idea!
> >
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > Please see below.
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> >> If it is OK, I'll resubmit the V2 of the patch series relative to the
> >> current master.
> >>
> >> Thanks, Akira.
> >>
> >> ---
> >> #!/bin/sh
> >> # [snip]
> >> #
> >>
> >> if test -z "$1"
> >> then
> >> echo No latex file, aborting.
> >> exit 1
> >> fi
> >>
> >> basename=`echo $1 | sed -e 's/\.tex$//'`
> >>
> >> iter=1
> >> echo "pdflatex $iter"
> >> pdflatex $basename > /dev/null 2>&1 < /dev/null || :
> >> if grep -q '! Emergency stop.' $basename.log
> >> then
> >> echo "----- Fatal latex error, see $basename.log for details. -----"
> >
> > Please add "exit 1" here. (Yes, this was a bug in my orignal. But as
> > long as we are here...)
> >
> >> fi
> >> if grep -q 'LaTeX Warning: There were undefined references' $basename.log
> >> then
> >> if test -d "$2"
> >> then
> >> bibtex $basename || :
> >> else
> >> echo "No bibliography directory, skipping bibtex."
> >> fi
> >> fi
> >> while grep -q 'LaTeX Warning: There were undefined references' $basename.log
> >> do
> >> if test "$iter" -eq 4
> >> then
> >> echo "Iteration limit: $iter passes through pdflatex"
> >> exit 1
> >> fi
> >> iter=`expr $iter + 1`
> >
> > This would be one point to add some indication of why we are doing
> > another pass through the loop. Might be as simple as adding "Undefined
> > references" to the "echo" below. Or maybe even show the last symbol
> > listed as undefined.
> >
> >> echo "pdflatex $iter"
> >> pdflatex $basename > /dev/null 2>&1 < /dev/null || :
> >> if grep -q '! Emergency stop.' $basename.log
> >> then
> >> echo "----- Fatal latex error, see $basename.log for details. -----"
> >> exit 1
> >> fi
> >> done
> >> while grep -q 'LaTeX Warning: Label(s) may have changed' $basename.log
> >> do
> >> if test "$iter" -ge 4
> >> then
> >> echo "Iteration limit: $iter passes through pdflatex"
> >> exit 1
> >> fi
> >> iter=`expr $iter + 1`
> >
> > This would be one point to add some indication of why we are doing
> > another pass through the loop. Might be as simple as adding "Label(s)
> > may have changed" to the "echo" below.
> >
> >> echo "pdflatex $iter"
> >> pdflatex $basename > /dev/null 2>&1 < /dev/null || :
> >> if grep -q '! Emergency stop.' $basename.log
> >> then
> >> echo "----- Fatal latex error, see $basename.log for details. -----"
> >> exit 1
> >> fi
> >> done
> >> grep "LaTeX Warning:" $basename.log
> >> exit 0
> >>
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-22 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 14:28 [PATCH 0/2] qqz and runlatex improvements Akira Yokosawa
2016-04-21 14:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] qqz: Improve accuracy of cross-links Akira Yokosawa
2016-04-21 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] runlatex.sh: Fix while loop condition Akira Yokosawa
2016-04-21 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-21 22:05 ` Akira Yokosawa
2016-04-21 23:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-22 12:58 ` Akira Yokosawa
2016-04-22 13:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-22 14:20 ` Akira Yokosawa
2016-04-22 15:28 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2016-04-23 2:14 ` Akira Yokosawa
2016-04-23 5:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160422152841.GC3756@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=perfbook@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox