Re: [FOLLOW-UP RFC PATCH] advsync: Minor fix of word choice

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 05:29:51PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >From 67433ddbf67a7d37e83426fed98228c245408c89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiysw@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:08:03 +0900
> Subject: [FOLLOW-UP RFC PATCH] advsync: Minor fix of word choice
> 
> This should have been "the vertical line", not "the vertical bar".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiysw@gmail.com>

I squashed this into your previous patch and also pulled in fixes for
a couple of grammatical nits.

Thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  advsync/memorybarriers.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/advsync/memorybarriers.tex b/advsync/memorybarriers.tex
> index dfbf0f3..9cc546c 100644
> --- a/advsync/memorybarriers.tex
> +++ b/advsync/memorybarriers.tex
> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ Again, CPU~0 coordinates the test, so does not record any values.
>  All CPUs eventually agree on the final value of 9, but not before
>  the values 15 and 12 take early leads.
>  Note that there are fourteen different opinions on the variable's value
> -at time 21 indicated by the vertical bar in the lower diagram.
> +at time 21 indicated by the vertical line in the lower diagram.
>  Note also that all CPUs see sequences whose orderings are consistent with
>  the directed graph shown in
>  Figure~\ref{fig:advsync:Possible Global Orders With More Simultaneous Values}.
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
>