Re: [PATCH] appendix/questions: Add missing NBSPs

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:34:45AM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>

Queued and pushed, thank you, SeongJae!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  appendix/questions/after.tex | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/appendix/questions/after.tex b/appendix/questions/after.tex
> index cbba768dd443..e648667614a4 100644
> --- a/appendix/questions/after.tex
> +++ b/appendix/questions/after.tex
> @@ -184,13 +184,13 @@ SMP code?
>  Simply use SMP primitives as designed.
> 
>  In this example, the easiest fix is to use locking, for example,
> -acquire a lock in the producer before line 10 in
> +acquire a lock in the producer before line~10 in
>  Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Producer Function} and in
>  the consumer before line~13 in
>  Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Consumer Function}.
>  This lock must also be released after line~13 in
>  Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Producer Function} and
> -after line 17 in
> +after line~17 in
>  Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Consumer Function}.
>  These locks cause the code segments in lines~10-13 of
>  Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Producer Function} and in lines~13-17 of
> -- 
> 2.10.0
>